Date: 20.11.2017 / Article Rating: 4 / Votes: 583
Nkq.essaytyper.cloudns.cx #Essay council complaints

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Essay council complaints

Essay council complaints

Oct/Sun/2017 | Uncategorized








Letter of complain Essay Example for Free

Essay council complaints

Write My Paper For Me -
Letter of complain Essay Example for Free

Anthem Essay Prompt 3 Essays and Research Papers. Council! Proctor, tries to christian scholarships tell the court that her friends were “sporting” in the woods. At that point, Abigail turns the tables on Mary by council complaints, convincing the court that . Mary’s spirit was out to get Abigail and the others. Argument Essay On Smoking! “Look out! She’s coming down (Miller. 3 . 1211)!” * Consequently, Abigail also supports the 1st definition of crucible because she builds upon the fear of others, which causes the “fire” to spread around the town of Salem. People who were treated in high regard (Rebecca, Elizabeth. Abigail Williams , John Proctor , Mary Warren 1044 Words | 3 Pages. The Anthem Dictatorship is the ultimate method of control.

It places one or more individuals above the rest of his or her society in council, . unopposed rule. In the argument on smoking story of essay council, Anthem the world is placed in a dystopian society in some unspecified time in the future. This society is ruled by a dictatorship ruled by one or multiple dictators the than death specifics are unknown. The ruling power has completely eradicated freedom and individual rights. This society is ruled under collectivism that has left the complaints world. Ayn Rand , Dictator , Individual 949 Words | 3 Pages. Term Never! ? Prompt 1 Think carefully about the issue presented in council, the following excerpt and the assignment below.

Given the importance of human . creativity, one would think it should have a high priority among our concerns. But if we look at the reality, we see a different picture. Basic scientific research is minimized in favor of immediate practical applications. Essay On Smoking! The arts are increasingly seen as dispensable luxuries. Yet as competition heats up around the complaints globe, exactly the opposite strategy is essay, needed. Essay Council Complaints! Adapted. English-language films , Following , Scientific method 1456 Words | 7 Pages. Ayn Rand's Anthem shows us her view of our world united under what seems to be communist rule. For example their view of argument essay on smoking, right and wrong; . Council! which Anthem portrays is a system of very strict rules which mainly make sure that everyone is involved in a collective role within the society in this system no one is considered an argument essay on smoking individual or that they can even think as an individual. From the day that Equality 7-2521 were united as one they have been considered freaks, because they were all about essay council complaints six feet. Apostrophe , Ayn Rand , Capital punishment 1371 Words | 3 Pages. ?To Kill A Mockingbird Essay Prompts Survey of Literature with Ms.

Wu ? Writing Goal: To construct a sophisticated, well . supported argument in argument on smoking, a polished literary analysis essay that masters the 9th Grade Writing Standard 2.2 for Language Arts. Essay Complaints! CA 9th Grade Writing Standards 2.2 Write responses to stronger than death literature: a) Demonstrate a comprehensive grasp of the significant ideas of council complaints, literary works. b) Support important ideas and viewpoints through accurate and stronger detailed references to the text or to other. Complaints! Harper Lee , Literature , Parti 768 Words | 4 Pages. It is very difficult to be able to advance in life if you are not allowed to think freely and council complaints become an individual. In the book Anthem , the . author, Ayn Rand depicts her concept of mankind through a society where individualism is immoral. The main character, Equality 7-2521, struggles to remain a collectivist, he begins to question his society and defy their beliefs and rules.

Equality 7-2521, successfully broke free from confinement when he came to the realization that To be free, a man must be. Ayn Rand , Collective , Collectivism 1096 Words | 3 Pages. |Earned Points | |Content (40) |40 . | | | |* The essay addresses all areas of the essay assignment thoroughly. | | | |* Content includes excellent details. | . Clear , Clearing , Description 362 Words | 3 Pages. 30 Simple 5 Paragraph Essay Prompts Es. Paragraph Essay Prompts : Essay Writing Prompts for Practicing College Writing | Suite10… 30 Simple 5 . Paragraph Essay Prompts Essay Writing Prompts for Practicing College Writing Ads by Google 0 IELTS Writing Writing Story Free Writing Writing Paper Like Oct 5, 2009 Kristina Bjoran 5 Paragraph Essays are Easy with Practice - Clipart.com, by Subscription The first and second semesters of college demand a lot of writing from new students. Here are essay writing prompts for beginning an essay , or simply. Essay , Essays , Five paragraph essay 969 Words | 4 Pages. Essay Council Complaints! Argumentative Essay Prompts 1. The Board of Education has decided to extend the school day for one hour because of the . increased graduation requirements.

Do you agree or disagree with making the school day longer? Write an essay to complaints the Board of Ed and argue your point of complaints, view. 2. A leading doctor has published research claiming all students should be in bed by 9:00 PM in order for them to learn well in school. Your parents are considering doing what the term never resold doctor suggests. Write an argument. Essay Council Complaints! Argument , College , Driver's license 1493 Words | 6 Pages. is the writer’s checklist for essay on smoking this essay : Essay 3 Writer’s Checklist for essay council Evaluation Essay 1. Love Stronger Than Death! Have . I included a clear description of the subject I am evaluating? a. I have included descriptions of my topic, and each part example given throughout my essay . 2. Does my thesis clearly state my opinion of the subject I am evaluating? a. Yes my opinion is essay, clearly stated. I have made sure to include a few examples to support why I favor this subject for my essay . 3 . Have I used effective criteria to term resold evaluate. Baking , Coming out , Cooking 837 Words | 3 Pages. ?Athena Fulk Senior English September 16, 2014 Comparison Essay Anthem is a story about council a 21-year old boy named Equality . 7-2521 and a 17-year old girl named Liberty 5-3000 who are both different from the format others in their secluded society which lacks individualism and self-interest.

The movie, Divergent, also follows a similar story line. Divergent is a story about an 18 year-old boy named Tobias Eaton and a 16-year old girl named Beatrice Prior who are both different from the others in essay complaints, their. Essay Complaints! A Story , Change , Faction 1145 Words | 6 Pages. ?Nhu Nguyen Mr. Alley BIBL 105 20 February 2014 Essay Question 3 In a human’s life, it takes a great amount of wisdom and . diligence to become successful. Thus, those who are lazy and foolish will have little chance of essay council, climbing to the top. Subsequently, one cannot help but wonder what the difference between diligence and laziness is, as well as between wisdom and folly, and the book of Proverbs is one that offers explanations to such a question. First, it is essay council complaints, important that people comprehend the difference. Bible , Book of essay complaints, Proverbs , Old Testament 799 Words | 4 Pages. ?Moore Brooke Professor Sharp Composition I 5 November 2014 Essay # 3 Approximately 443,000 people die prematurely from essay love than smoking . or exposure to essay complaints secondhand smoke each year.

Smoking Harms nearly every organ of the body and causes many diseases and reduces the term papers never resold health of smokers in general. Smoking during pregnancy would be an example of the harmful risk factors, and not only harms the mother but also the child. Even though many people think that menthol and complaints e-cigs are less harmful, they have the same. Term Papers! Cancer , Lung cancer , Myocardial infarction 879 Words | 3 Pages. ? Essay # 3 The voyages of discovery and of the new world were promoted by many factors economically, technologically, . politically, and essay council complaints religiously. In the years from about 1450 to 1525 there were many reasons as to why explorations were aided by the main four factors that were previously stated. Advancements in astronomy and navigation were big technological factors. Countries were gaining little income, causing them to go and christian scholarships search for ways to essay complaints become prosperous was an economic factor. Scholarships! The. Essay Council Complaints! Christopher Columbus , Crown of Castile , Europe 826 Words | 3 Pages. Strayer AP Practice Essay Prompts Chapter 1 and 2 1. Analyze the continuities and changes that resulted from the spread of argument essay, . Complaints! agriculture beginning around 10,000 years ago to 5000 years ago. 2. Compare the interaction between humans and the environment between two of the following types of societies between 3000 B.C.E. a. Hunter-gather b. Christian Scholarships! Agricultural c. Pastoral Chapter 3 1. Analyze the council complaints continuities and changes in social and economic life that emerged as a result of the formation of city-states.

Asia , Central Asia , Iran 1131 Words | 7 Pages. Virginia Winston Essay 3 Hebrew Wisdom on Diligence and Laziness The book of argument, Proverbs is council complaints, a book that can provide us with . wisdom and essay knowledge for effective every day living. Proverbs supply wisdom for all people regardless of essay complaints, their age, sex or position in society. God wants his people to christian scholarships be wise and informed with quality applications for essay complaints a successful and format a term blessed lifestyle. An attribute to possess in order to obtain great wisdom on diligence and laziness is first we must have the council complaints fear of. Bible , Book of Proverbs , Hebrew Bible 1038 Words | 3 Pages. ?Brandon Nelson 12/5/2014 EN 11011 Essay 3 Beatdown by the Badge. Police brutality has been an for writing a term issue in essay council, America now for quite . some time. In The Wind! Recently, it seems to have hit crisis proportions.

There are protests popping up in cities all across the country. Why is police brutality now in council complaints, the national spotlight and on nest in the wind essay the tips of most Americans tongues? Due to essay council the advancement of technology the last 15 years or so, people now have the in the wind ability on their phone to video record and upload to the internet, police. Complaints! Abuse , Chicago Police Department , Constable 1056 Words | 3 Pages. Bankers Adda How to write Essay in SBI PO Exam? Dear readers, as you know that SBI PO 2014 Paper will also contain a Descriptive Test of 50 . marks (1 hour duration), which will consist of English Language Comprehension, Short Precis, Letter Writing Essay ). So, here we are presenting you How to write Essay ? and few points to remember while writing an essay in the exam, which will be important for upcoming SBI PO exam. How to write an essay ? 1. Analyze the prompt . Note exactly what is. Essay , Jawaharlal Nehru , Linguistics 812 Words | 4 Pages. Ayn Rand's novella, Anthem , displays a dystopian and in the essay totalitarian society that is in opposition to individualism. As shown in council, . Anthem and many other real and fictionalized totalitarian societies, children live apart from their families.

Why? Because dictatorial leaders enforce this living arrangement among the kinsfolk. Dictators often will enforce families living apart from each other. Format! In some cases, this happens mainly because dictators don't want parents to feed their children information about. Autocracy , Ayn Rand , Dictator 1981 Words | 7 Pages. ?Diantae Thomas March 24 2015 Mrs.David English 101 Being Against Animal Rights In the essay essay , “The Case For Animals Rights”, Tom Regan . Term Never! stresses that, “the fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to essay view animals as our resources, here for us- to argument on smoking be eaten, or surgically manipulated, or exploited for sports or money.” As an animal lover, I would never want to intentionally harm or kill any animal without a justifiable cause. But within reason, animals should not be treated equally as human. A Theory of Justice , Animal rights , Human 836 Words | 5 Pages. Argumentative Essay Frist Draft Prompt 1. ?WRI 101 Spring 15 Argumentative Essay Frist Draft Prompt Assignment: You have to write an argumentative essay . for or against one of these arguments.

You can still come up with your own arguments after you run them by me. Important Notes: 1- Your position will be determined based on the audience ( You have to persuade those who disagree with your position) 2- You cannot change the audience 3 - You cannot change the purpose 4- You should use the sources to support your arguments and counterarguments. Arab , Critical thinking , Culture 831 Words | 2 Pages. SS 100 WRITING COMMUNICATION Spring 2013 Assignment 1 Persuasive Essay – Section 1 Select one of these prompts write a . persuasive essay in which you develop your point of council, view on the given issue. Support your position with reasoning, facts examples taken from your readings, experiences, or observations. Your persuasive essay should not be a purely research based essay ; rather you should aim to convince your audience to your way of thinking through your own logic and reasoning. Scholarships! Your ability.

Bibliography , Citation , Critical thinking 443 Words | 2 Pages. Complaints! read Aesop’s fables then I can quickly fill myself in with the essay necessary background information I need to council understand the context of these stories through an essay council . Council! additional source; Wikipedia for example. Likewise, when I read the original story for this essay question, I was unaware of what a begum, or a Birbal is. However, because I am a native English speaker it was easy for me to quickly find and understand this additional information and essay on smoking make myself aware of the council context. By checking the meaning of these. Emperor , England , English language 1238 Words | 4 Pages. you will see that they do go hand in argument essay on smoking, hand.

In Proverbs 6:6-8, it says, “Go to essay council the ant, you sluggard; consider its ways and be wise! It has no commander, no . Papers Never! overseer or ruler, yet it stores its provisions in summer and gathers its food at harvest” ( 3 ). The ant is diligent by complaints, going out, on its own free will, and prepared the fields for his crops in the summer and then when harvest arrived, he was blessed with a bountiful harvest. Love Death! This example mirrors diligence with wisdom. Essay Council! He was wise by preparing. Bible , Book of Proverbs , New Testament 824 Words | 3 Pages. Anthem Emma Lee Stanton March 3 , 2011 Anthem Essay Lit. Genre In . Essay Love Than Death! Anthem the leaders start to destroy the minds of the citizens in essay complaints, the society starting at birth and until the day they die. One of which are that they teach everyone within their society that there is no one and that it is wrong to only think about yourself or to argument essay want for yourself. The novel Anthem by Ayn Rand shows that if a dictator is to fully control a man then that person must not only enslave the body. Council! Ayn Rand , Cognition , Cognitive science 565 Words | 2 Pages. Anthem Essay No “I” and no “you”, just “we.” How could we live in a world like that?

Ayn Rand’s book shows a twisted and argument . Essay Complaints! different form of on smoking, collectivism. Everyone is told what they have to do for the rest of their future. Children are not even allowed to know who their parents are and are never given the chance to meet them. Although, only one shines in the society that no one else may see until now. Equality finds it difficult to find individualism in his life and in the rules of his society. Equality. Ayn Rand , Collectivism , Individual 1016 Words | 3 Pages.

Spring 2014 Essay 3 The Longman Reader Select one of the topics below and essay complaints respond in an essay of between 650 and council . Council! 1000 words. Develop your own thesis and supporting ideas/details. Include clear, concrete examples so that you can “show” rather than “tell.” Write a 1- 3 sentence summary of either the than TedTalks Video or The Longman Reader essay in complaints, your essay so that your readers understand your references. Also include a quotation from the argument essay on smoking essay . Acknowledge any source you use in your essay both in the. Essay Council Complaints! Bystander effect , EconTalk , Essay 907 Words | 2 Pages. A Raisin In The Sun MLK Hughes In Class Essay Prompt Rubric. ? Student: _______________________________________ Date: _____________ Class: __________________ ASSIGNMENT: A Raisin in the Sun In-class . Essay PROMPT : 1. You have read A Raisin in the Sun, a play about one man's dreams for himself and his family. You have read Martin Luther King, Jr.'s I Have a Dream speech in which he speaks of the realities of love stronger than, life and his dreams for the future for all Americans. Although Raisin in the Sun is fiction and Dr. King's speech is non-fiction, one can find many.

100 Greatest African Americans , African American , Critical thinking 617 Words | 3 Pages. ? Essay Instructions You will write 4 essays (double spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font). The first essay must . Essay Council! be 1,000–1,200 words, and the following essays must be 750–1,000 words each. Essay one corresponds to council the essay one prompt as listed below. Essay two corresponds with the essay two prompt , etc. through all four essays . Each essay is essay council, a separate assignment. In completing each essay , research must be conducted through 2–4 peer-reviewed, scholarly sources in term never resold, addition to the Bible and the. Bible , Religious text 990 Words | 3 Pages. ? Essay 3 Southampton Solent University School of XX Faculty of YY succeed@solent Level 1 10 credits 2,000 word . essay Student name : Stuart Dent Course title : Academic Skills Seminar tutor : Andrew Doig Stuart Dent 1 Essay 3 Standards of academic writing among British university students are falling.

Discuss. Essay Council! Introduction In this paper, it is understood that ‘academic writing’ has the meaning as clearly given by Hopkins (2008) of “'structured research' written by 'scholars' for. Academia , Academic dishonesty , College 2279 Words | 9 Pages. Council! ?Ayn Rand the author of the book Anthem was born in essay council complaints, St. Stronger Death! Petersburg, Russia, in 1905, which is the year that marked the defeat of the Russians . and their rising military. Rand wrote her book as a warning against Soviet Communism before the end of council, World War II. Term Papers! Anthem is a book of dystopian fiction which explains a hatred society. Rand’s main character Equality 7-2521 is a young man living in a society where people have lost all knowledge of council, individualism to the point where people use the word “we”. Ayn Rand , Collective , Collectivism 1414 Words | 4 Pages. the topic Effective Introduction Worksheet Instructions: Copy and paste the following text into a document or create a document that contains the same . information. Christian! Complete the following steps and your introduction will be written! 1. Essay! You’re writing Prompt : August 29 1963, is the date that MLK changed the world’s view on term papers never resold segregation of complaints, whites and blacks. Many think that MLK was a gift from God.

King wanted people to judge each other based on character and the behaviors they showed you. Love Death! When you think. Complaints! African American , Black people , Leo Tolstoy 929 Words | 3 Pages. because he doesn’t know how to complaints perform any magical spells. Conclusion/Opinion Book Reviews 1) “An authentic work of great talent” New York Times 2) . “A compelling and action-filled adventure. a galloping good example of its genre” Daily Telegraph 3 ) “This book portrays achievement. Readers will be transported” Sunday Times 4) “A portrayal of council, true affection between boy and dragon. Paolini writes like someone gripped by his own story” Guardian 5) “Filled with darkness and wind evil, excitement and. Essay Council Complaints! Brisingr , Christopher Paolini , Dragon Rider 1865 Words | 5 Pages. ? Cover Letter The revisions I have made to format for writing paper my paper regarding the mid-term prompt #2, if this book should be banned from the essay high school . curriculum across the country, include many things. I added more ways of which this book would harm individuals in high school who read it, because this is the main focus of my paper in regards to the prompt . I also included more in-text citations from The Bluest Eye to support my claim and my evidence that support it. I included another counter argument that. Child sexual abuse , High school , High School Musical 1990 Words | 6 Pages. What was the purpose of the essay ? In your response, explore the deeper meaning of this question.

The goal is not just to complete the . assignment but instead to convey a message. What do you plan to accomplish with this essay ? What do you hope the reader takes away from this argument? The purpose of the essay is to have readers to consider what they put in their mouth: is it healthy; is it going to raise your BP; or do I want to live. I plan to accomplish with this essay a healthier way of living. African American , Diabetes mellitus , Health 1009 Words | 3 Pages. Literature and Composition (Periods 1, 3 , 4, 6 7) Write the following assignment on loose leaf paper and then staple it to love stronger than this sheet. . This assignment needs to be completed by the end of the period. Carefully read the “Summer Wind” essay by essay council, Verlyn Klinkenborg and then answer the following questions: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/18/opinion/18fri4.html?_r=1 1. Explain how the author describes the wind in three sentences? Provide one quote from the format for writing essay . 2. Copy down at least three. Essay , Following , Plutarch 1249 Words | 4 Pages. Writing prompts for middle school.

Writing Prompts for Middle School Middle School Expository/Informative Prompts 1. Essay Complaints! NEW Imagine that you could give advice to . someone—it could be someone you know personally, a historical figure, or a famous pers on council living today. Write an essay that identifies the person and the advice you would give. Choose a fam iliar subject so that you can provide details and essay council elaboration that explain why this person needs your advice. 2. In an essay , explain how disappointments can have a good side. Council! . A Story , College , Essay 1548 Words | 6 Pages. Anthem Essay Teenagers have a taste so discerning it’s almost like they are a different species. Teenagers are . rebellious souls. They always believe society is against them. It makes sense that they would like dystopian books because they are all about the world being against them. Teenagers like Anthem because it depicts what they feel their lives are like. They believe they live in a society that tries to conform teenagers, punishes difference and council complaints because it depicts what teenagers think.

Adolescence , Anarchism , Ayn Rand 626 Words | 2 Pages. Essay Council Complaints! Anthem and council Fahrenheit 451 comparative essay. ? In both Anthem and Fahrenheit 451 the society the characters live in is government controlled and they limit certain things in the lives . of the citizens. Both of the essay complaints authors of these books are trying to complaints warn today’s societies about the dangers of the different faults they each exhibit and how today’s societies are starting to reflect the warnings of the books. Both Anthem and Fahrenheit 451 warn today’s societies about when government has overbearing control and holds knowledge from its citizens. Control , Fahrenheit 451 , Form of government 3094 Words | 7 Pages. ?11/ 3 /2014 Prompt # 3 Markets have four different models which are perfect competition market, . monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and pure monopoly markets.

Each market has its own characteristics in terms of on smoking, barriers, price control, and the kind of products. An oligopoly market can be defined as a market which has a few large producers of homogenous or differentiated products. Council! Moreover each firm is affected by the decisions of its rival and must take those decisions into consideration. Competition , Economics , Externality 331 Words | 2 Pages. Love Stronger Than Death! Analysis of Anthem for essay complaints Doomed Youth. Analysis of “ Anthem for Doomed Youth” Originally published in 1920, shortly after World War I, “ Anthem for love stronger Doomed Youth” . demonstrates the horror of the unjust deaths of young soldiers. Council Complaints! “ Anthem for Doomed Youth” is a poem about Owen’s distain towards the honourless way in essay than, which young soldiers pass on, and the impact their deaths have on the loved ones they leave behind. Council Complaints! The following essay will show that in the anti-war poem, “ Anthem for Doomed Youth”, Owen uses sensational description. Iambic pentameter , Poetic form , Poetry 1373 Words | 4 Pages. Council! 2013 Animal Bill Of Rights Essay Prewri. ?2013 English 12 Animal Bill of Rights Essay Background: An Organization called the Animal Legal Defense Fund has sponsored a petition that . calls for increased protection for essay complaints the rights of essay complaints, animals. It says the following: Deprived of legal protection, animals are defenseless against exploitation and abuse by humans.

Through the Animal Bill of Rights, the Animal Legal Defense Fund is working to show Congress a groundswell* of support for legislation that protects animals and essay council complaints recognizes that, like. Animal rights , Essay , Five paragraph essay 409 Words | 4 Pages. Five-Paragraph Essay Project: Thesis, Supporting Points, Outline To do well on in the wind essay a project you should be prepared to spend time over several . days to do your best work. Essay! You should plan to apply yourself to your project, take a break from it, and come back several times to polish and for writing a term refine your work. Council Complaints! Your goal for this project is to complete some exercises about a prompt for a five-paragraph essay . The essay will be due. Essay , Five paragraph essay , Rhetoric 1291 Words | 5 Pages. identify the essay council complaints roots you will set the. equal to zero, solve for x, and the results you received are your two real roots. Determining the Roots Example 2: . Essay Complaints! State the x-intercepts Example 3 : State the essay complaints x-intercepts Set equal to 0: Set equal to 0: Solve for x: Solve for x: 3 If the parabola only touches one place on the x- axis then it only has one real root.

The point you see when you determine the one real root is essay complaints, also known as the vertex. The vertex. Conic section , Critical point , Fermat's theorem 873 Words | 7 Pages. strong lack of wisdom and diligence. Throughout this essay the teachings of Hebrew wisdom regarding these topics will be discussed in essay stronger than, great . Essay Complaints! detail. Solomon is thought to be the wisest man in in the wind essay, history. “In fact, his wisdom exceeded that of essay complaints, all the wise men of the East and the wise men of Egypt” (1 Kings 4:30, New Living Translation).

Solomon became king at a very young age and at this time while Solomon acted in format, with the decrees of essay council complaints, David (1 King 3 : 3 ) (Maller, 2011). Solomon’s teachings in Proverbs are. Bible , Book of Proverbs , New International Version 774 Words | 4 Pages. Level 3 Essay Questions For Practice. ?Level 3 Essay Questions: NOVEL Plan each of the following essay questions. Write the introduction for each. . Develop at essay least 2 of these before exams. Hand into your teacher and take note of the feedback so you can aim to get to the next level of achievement. Essay Complaints! Choose ONE topic.

Read the whole topic and make sure you understand it before you begin your answer. Write an essay of AT LEAST 400 words. Your essay should develop a critical response based on close analysis of appropriate text(s). You should. Character , Fiction , Literature 1329 Words | 5 Pages. Anthem Essay In the novella Anthem , Ayn Rand promotes her vision of human nature by creating a society in which . Individualism is a sin. The main character, Equality struggles in this world when he questions the belief of Collectivism that his government forces upon its people. Equality eventually realizes To be free, a man must be free of his brothers”. In other words, he can not succeed in life if he is not independent and different from paper everyone who is in his society. Collectivism is the difference. Essay Council Complaints! Anarchism , Ayn Rand , Collectivism 779 Words | 2 Pages. face some psychological problems due to scholarships their Internet addiction.

In the essay “Internet Addiction or Excessive Internet Use”, Weisteinand and council complaints . Lejoyeux have reviewed many cross-sectional studies to scholarships prove that there are high risk of essay complaints, mental disorder among Internet addicts such as “affective disorder, anxiety disorders (including generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder), and complaints attention deficit hyperactivity disorder” ( 3 ). It is also found that there is essay, a positive relationship between Internet. Addiction , Drug addiction , Facebook 2389 Words | 8 Pages. ?Dystopian Essay ( Essay of Definition) Ultimate Goal: 1. Define, in your eyes, what makes a dystopian society 2. Use our . 3 novels, “Harrison Bergeron”, and at least 2 scholarly articles to influence your concept of dystopia According to the New World Encyclopedia, “dystopia” is defined as follows: A dystopia (from the Greek ???- and ?????, alternatively, cacotopia, kakotopia, cackotopia, or anti-utopia) is the essay stronger than vision of a society that is the opposite complaints of utopia. A dystopian society is one. Dystopia , Fahrenheit 451 , George Orwell 810 Words | 4 Pages. ?Analysis Anthem for Doomed Youth, 1917 by Wilfred Owen Anthem for Doomed youth1 What passing-bells for these who die as . cattle? Only the essay on smoking monstrous anger of the essay complaints guns. Essay! Only the stuttering rifles’ rapid rattle Can patter out their hasty orisons. No mockeries now for them; no prayers nor bells; Nor any voice of mourning save the choirs, – The shrill, demented choirs of wailing shells; And bugles calling for them from sad shires. Essay Council Complaints! What candles may be held to speed them all? Not. Iambic pentameter , Madrid Metro , Meter 911 Words | 3 Pages. Essay Council! ?Troy Truong EWRT 1A Dayharsh 3 /9/2015 The iEducation: Model 2015 – Manufactured by Society We live in an era where a myriad of essay complaints, gadgets and . Term Papers! gizmos are available for our everyday convenience.

A time where people are willing to essay line up outside of an Apple store for a $750 phone or a group of distraught adults that are ready to murder one another in a Walmart for the latest electronics their children want for Christmas; is this the ideal use for high technology? Kids nowadays will have these high technologies. Format A Term! Education , Educational psychology , Figure 8 1423 Words | 6 Pages. ?Lauren Thomas 12/12/13 HELA Anthem Essay By the end of the novel, Equality finally understands why he never felt any guilt . for his sins and transgressions. He comes to this realization, because he understands that his sins were thinking freely and complaints choosing how he wants to live instead of being told how to live by the Council. A Term Paper! Because society wants to stop free thinking and make everyone the same and equal in every way, they don’t like people like Equality who strive to be better.

Equality. Conscience , Critical thinking , Human 544 Words | 2 Pages. ?SAT ESSAY PROMPT You have twenty-five minutes to write an council complaints essay on the topic assigned below. Think carefully . about the issue presented in argument, the following excerpt and the assignment below. Essay! NOTE: read complete the scholarships excerpt first. Most of our schools are not facing up to their responsibilities. We must begin to ask ourselves whether educators should help students address the critical moral choices and social issues of our time. Schools have responsibilities beyond training people for jobs and getting. Analogy , Education in the United States , SAT 1469 Words | 4 Pages. Essay Council! ? Essay # 3 Kathya Ibanez Truckee Meadows Community College Philosophy 210 Joseph Dudum Oct 2, 2014 Abstract This paper is . focused in the teachings of Buddhism and how Buddha developed the essay council religion. I also wrote about karma and how is essay council complaints, it possible that the for writing a term religion believes in karma if they do not believe in a permanent soul, I also wrote about how they also share some common practices or beliefs with the Hinduism. Essay Council Complaints! Basic Teaching of Buddhism The teachings of Buddha can be difficult to understand.

Buddhism , Dukkha , Four Noble Truths 1005 Words | 6 Pages. Matthew Jones Date: 5/18/15 Graded Assignment Sample College Essay Instructions To complete this assignment you will need to access this . current year’s college essay prompts at the Common Application website. To locate the forms, go to stronger death the Common Application: Download Forms at https://www.commonapp.org/CommonApp/DownloadForms.aspx and download the Application PDF. Scroll down to the Writing section and locate the essay prompts under Personal Essay . Submit this assignment to your teacher by the due date for. For Writing A Term Paper! Audience , College admissions in the United States , Common Application 845 Words | 3 Pages. English Essay ‘ Anthem For Doomed Youth’ Anthem For Doomed Youth by Wilfred Owen is essay council complaints, a poem which I read . Essay Complaints! recently, in essay council, which the author conveys horror’s of death in World War 1. The author‘s use of technique’s is quite effective. His use of the for writing a term paper sonnet form, word choice, juxtaposition, irony and essay council complaints figurative language creates a strong image of the tragedy lack of love death, respect for council the young soldier’s dying at war. Anthem For Doomed Youth is one of best known World War poem’s because of the way in the. Death , Napoleonic Wars , Poetry 1090 Words | 4 Pages. Mehserle's criminal defense attorney, argued that Mehserle mistakenly shot Grant with his pistol, intending to use his taser when he saw Grant reaching for . his waistband.

On January 30, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Morris Jacobson set bail for term papers never Mehserle at $ 3 million. A week later, with the complaints help of fundraising from the police union, Mehserle posted bail. Argument Essay On Smoking! Oscar Grant had been celebrating New Year's Eve with his friends at complaints the Embarcadero in San Francisco, and was returning to the East Bay in the lead car. Bay Area Rapid Transit , Chicago Police Department , Constable 1638 Words | 7 Pages. 15/14 Comparison Essay Animal Farm and The Palestinian Arab-Israeli Conflict of 1946 In writing Animal Farm, the for writing author Orwell . illustrates disillusionment with socialist revolution. Although the novel has often been linked with the Russian Revolution of 1916, it still has contemporary relevance. The Palestinian Arab-Israeli Conflict parallels Animal Farm in three different ways, rallying flag, despotism, and equality.

When joining in to sing an anthem , you are making a commitment. 1948 Palestinian exodus , Animal Farm , Arab citizens of Israel 872 Words | 3 Pages. Descriptive Essay - My Private Hideaway. Council! Doing a Prewrite for essay love stronger a full essay . In short: Use the prompt your given to complaints create enough topic sentences that, when proven, . answer the essay death entire prompt . If it’s a difficult prompt , you can create these topic sentences from the evidence (quotes) you first find in the book that you will use to prove your points. Your thesis is then the summary of the topic sentences you came up with. Essay Council Complaints! It should be as specific as possible, while still summarizing the totality of christian scholarships, what your topic sentences claim. Essay , Law , Question 378 Words | 3 Pages. Needs to earn money pg.

209 Pay loans Deadline issues Angelica, who left Emory owing more than $60,000 (pg 198) Lower quality schools . Little guidance from council family or school officials (pg 199) More single parent homes (she was part of one) pg. 200 3 School won’t make retroactive adjustments (pg.209) Low­income “I don’t want to work at Walmart” like her mother Bianca “Leaving felt like betrayal, “I thought it was more important to be at home than to be selfish and be at school.” Pg. 207 8th paragraph .

Best Custom Academic Essay Writing Help & Writing Services UK Online -
Complaint essay

nsf cover letter NSF 16-1 January 25, 2016. Chapter II - Proposal Preparation Instructions. Each proposing organization that is new to NSF or has not had an essay council complaints, active NSF assistance award within the nest in the wind essay previous five years should be prepared to submit basic organization and management information and certifications, when requested, to the applicable award-making division within the Office of Budget, Finance Award Management (BFA). The requisite information is described in the NSF Prospective New Awardee Guide.

The information contained in this Guide will assist the organization in preparing documents which NSF requires to conduct administrative and financial reviews of the organization. This Guide also serves as a means of highlighting the accountability requirements associated with Federal awards. To facilitate proposal preparation, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) regarding proposal preparation and submission are available on the NSF website. 8. Proposers should also be aware of core strategies that are essential to the fulfillment of NSF’s mission, as articulated in Investing in Science, Engineering, and Education for the Nation’s Future: NSF Strategic Plan, 2014-2018 . These strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. NSF’s mission is particularly well-implemented through the integration of research and essay council, education and broadening participation in NSF programs, projects, and essay on smoking, activities. One of the strategic objectives in support of NSF’s mission is to foster integration of research and education through the essay complaints programs, projects, and activities it supports at nest in the, NSF awardee organizations. These organizations recruit, train, and prepare a diverse science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce to advance the frontiers of science and participate in the US technology-based economy. NSF’s contribution to essay the national innovation ecosystem is to papers never resold provide cutting-edge research under the guidance of the Nation’s most creative scientists and engineers. NSF also supports development of council a strong STEM workforce by investing in building the knowledge that informs improvements in STEM teaching and learning. NSF’s mission calls for the broadening of essay opportunities and expanding participation of groups, organizations, and geographic regions that are underrepresented in STEM disciplines, which is essential to complaints the health and vitality of science and christian scholarships, engineering.

NSF is essay, committed to this principle of essay stronger than diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports. A. Conformance with Instructions for Proposal Preparation. It is important that all proposals conform to the instructions provided in the GPG or NSF Grants.gov Application Guide. Conformance is required and will be strictly enforced unless an authorization to deviate from standard proposal preparation requirements has been approved. NSF will not accept or will return without review proposals that are not consistent with these instructions. See GPG Chapter IV.B for additional information. Essay Council! NSF authorization to deviate from these instructions must be received prior to proposal submission. Deviations may be authorized in council complaints one of two ways: 1. through specification of different requirements in an NSF program solicitation; or. 2. by essay complaints the written approval of the cognizant NSF Assistant Director/Office Head or designee.

These approvals to wind essay deviate from NSF proposal preparation instructions may cover a particular program or programs or, in essay complaints rare instances, an individual deviation for a particular proposal. Proposers may deviate from these instructions only to the extent authorized. In The Essay! Proposals must include an authorization to deviate from standard NSF proposal preparation instructions in one of the following ways, as appropriate: (a) by identifying the solicitation number that authorized the deviation in the appropriate block on the Cover Sheet; or (b) for individual deviations, by identifying the name, date and title of the NSF official authorizing the deviation. B. Format of the Proposal. Prior to submission, it is strongly recommended that proposers conduct an administrative review to council ensure that proposals comply with the council proposal preparation guidelines established in the GPG or the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide. Complaints! The Proposal Preparation Checklist (GPG Exhibit II-1) may be used to in the wind essay assist in this review. The checklist is not intended to council complaints be an all-inclusive repetition of the required proposal contents and associated proposal preparation guidelines.

It is, however, meant to highlight certain critical items so they will not be overlooked when the proposal is prepared. Upon entering the nest wind proposal preparation module, the PI will be prompted to select information describing the nature and type of proposal being developed. A collaborative proposal from essay council one organization (see GPG Chapter II.D.5.a); A collaborative proposal from multiple organizations (see GPG Chapter II.D.5.b); or. The type of proposal being developed: Facility/Center (see relevant funding opportunity); or. The requested proposal information noted above will be used to determine the applicable proposal preparation business rules that must be followed. Proposers are strongly advised to review the applicable sections of the GPG pertinent to the type of proposal being developed PRIOR to submission.

1. Proposal Pagination Instructions. Proposers are advised that FastLane does not automatically paginate a proposal. For Writing A Term! Each section of the proposal that is uploaded as a file should be individually paginated prior to being uploaded to the electronic system. 2. Proposal Margin and Spacing Requirements. The proposal must conform to the following requirements: a. Use one of the following typefaces identified below: Arial 9 , Courier New, or Palatino Linotype at a font size of essay 10 points or larger; Times New Roman at a font size of 11 points or larger; or Computer Modern family of fonts at a font size of 11 points or larger.

A font size of christian scholarships less than 10 points may be used for mathematical formulas or equations, figures, table or diagram captions and when using a Symbol font to insert Greek letters or special characters. PIs are cautioned, however, that the essay council text must still be readable. b. No more than six lines of text within a vertical space of one inch. c. Margins, in all directions, must be at least an inch. These requirements apply to all uploaded sections of a proposal, including supplementary documentation. 3. On Smoking! Page Formatting. Proposers are strongly encouraged to essay council complaints use only a standard, single-column format for the text. The guidelines specified above establish the minimum type size requirements; however, PIs are advised that readability is of paramount importance and should take precedence in selection of an appropriate font for use in the proposal. Small type size makes it difficult for reviewers to read the proposal; consequently, the use of small type not in compliance with the above guidelines may be grounds for NSF to council return the proposal without review. Adherence to essay complaints type size and line spacing requirements also is necessary to ensure that no proposer will have an unfair advantage, by using smaller type or line spacing to provide more text in the proposal.

C. Essay On Smoking! Proposal Contents. 1. Single-Copy Documents. Certain categories of information that are submitted in conjunction with a proposal are for NSF Use Only. As such, the complaints information is not provided to reviewers for use in the review of the proposal. With the exception of proposal certifications (which are submitted via the Authorized Organizational Representative function 10 ), these documents should be submitted via the Proposal Preparation Module.

A summary of each of these categories follows: a. Authorization to wind Deviate from NSF Proposal Preparation Requirements (if applicable) Instructions for obtaining authorization to deviate from complaints NSF proposal preparation instructions are provided in GPG Chapter II.A. b. List of Suggested Reviewers or Reviewers Not to Include (optional) Proposers may include a list of suggested reviewers (including email address and institutional affiliation) who they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal. Proposers also may designate persons they would prefer not review the proposal, indicating why.

These suggestions are optional. GPG Exhibit II-2 contains information on conflicts of interest that may be useful in preparation of essay this list. The cognizant Program Officer handling the proposal considers the suggestions and may contact the council complaints proposer for further information. Essay Love Than Death! The decision whether or not to essay complaints use the suggestions, however, remains with the in the Program Officer. c. Proprietary or Privileged Information (if applicable) Instructions for submission of proprietary or privileged information are provided in GPG Chapter I.D.3. d. Proposal Certifications. With the exception of the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF LLL) identified below, the procedures for complaints, submission of the proposal certifications differ from those used with other single-copy documents. The AOR must use the Authorized Organizational Representative function in FastLane to sign and submit the proposal, including the proposal certifications.

It is the proposing organization's responsibility to essay assure that only properly authorized individuals perform this function. Essay! 11. The required proposal certifications are as follows: Certification for Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) or Individual Proposer: The AOR is required to complete certifications regarding the accuracy and completeness of statements contained in the proposal, as well as to certify that the organization (or individual) agrees to accept the obligation to comply with award terms and conditions. Certification Regarding Conflict of Interest: The AOR is required to complete certifications stating that the organization has implemented and is enforcing a written policy on conflicts of interest (COI), consistent with the provisions of council AAG Chapter IV.A: that, to the best of his/her knowledge, all financial disclosures required by the conflict of interest policy were made; and essay council complaints, that conflicts of interest, if any, were, or prior to the organization’s expenditure of christian scholarships any funds under the award, will be, satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated in accordance with the organization’s conflict of essay council interest policy. Conflicts that cannot be satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated, and research that proceeds without the imposition of conditions or restrictions when a conflict of interest exists, must be disclosed to NSF via use of NSF’s electronic systems.

Drug-Free Workplace: The AOR is required to complete a certification regarding the Drug-Free Workplace Act. See GPG Exhibit II-2 for the full text of the scholarships Drug-Free Workplace Certification. Debarment and Suspension: The AOR is required to complete a certification regarding Debarment and Suspension. See GPG Exhibit II-3 for the full text of the Debarment and Suspension Certification. Certification Regarding Lobbying: When the proposal exceeds $100,000, the AOR is essay council complaints, required to complete a certification regarding lobbying restrictions. Format A Term! The Certification for council, Contracts, Grants, Loans and Cooperative Agreements is included in full text on the FastLane submission screen as well as in GPG Exhibit II-5. The box for Disclosure of christian scholarships Lobbying Activities must be checked on essay complaints the proposal Cover Sheet only wind essay if, pursuant to paragraph 2 of the certification, submission of the SF LLL is essay complaints, required.

12. Certification Regarding Nondiscrimination: The AOR is required to complete a certification regarding compliance with NSF nondiscrimination regulations and policies. See GPG Exhibit II-5 for for writing a term paper, the full text of the Nondiscrimination Certification. This certification sets forth the nondiscrimination obligations with which all grantees must comply. These obligations also apply to subrecipients or contractors under the award. The proposer, therefore, shall obtain the NSF Nondiscrimination Certification from each organization that applies to essay council be, or serves as a subrecipient or contractor under the award (for other than the provision of commercially available supplies, materials, equipment or general support services) prior to entering into the subaward or contract arrangement. Certification Regarding Flood Hazard Insurance: Two sections of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 USC § 4012a and § 4106) bar Federal agencies from giving financial assistance for acquisition or construction purposes in christian scholarships any area identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as having special flood hazards unless the: (1) community in which that area is located participates in the national flood insurance program; and. (2) building (and any related equipment) is covered by adequate flood insurance. By signing the proposal certification pages, AORs for prospective grantees located in FEMA-designated special flood hazard areas are certifying that adequate flood insurance has been or will be obtained in the following situations: (1) for NSF grants for the construction of a building or facility, regardless of the essay council complaints dollar amount of the grant; and. (2) for other NSF grants when more than $25,000 has been budgeted in scholarships the proposal for repair, alteration or improvement (construction) of a building or facility. Prospective grantees should contact their local government or a federally-insured financial institution to determine what areas are identified as having special flood hazards and the availability of essay complaints flood insurance in essay council their community.

Certification Regarding Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) 13 : The AOR is required to complete a certification that the essay institution has a plan to on smoking provide appropriate training and oversight in the responsible and ethical conduct of essay complaints research to undergraduates, graduate students, and postdoctoral researchers who will be supported by NSF to conduct research. Additional information on NSF’s RCR policy is available in the AAG Chapter IV.B. While training plans are not required to be included in proposals submitted to NSF, institutions are advised that they are subject to review upon request. Certification Regarding Organizational Support : The AOR is on smoking, required to complete a certification that there is organizational support for the proposal as required by Section 526 of the complaints America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 . This support extends to christian scholarships the portion of the proposal developed to satisfy the broader impacts review criterion as well as the intellectual merit review criterion, and any additional review criteria specified in the solicitation. Organizational support will be made available, as described in the proposal, in order to essay complaints address the essay love stronger than death broader impacts and essay council complaints, intellectual merit activities to papers be undertaken. Certification Regarding Federal Tax Obligations : When the proposal exceeds $5,000,000, the AOR is required to complete a certification regarding Federal tax obligations. Essay Council Complaints! By signing the certification pages, the argument essay on smoking AOR certifies that, to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, the proposing organization: (1) has filed all Federal tax returns required during the three years preceding this certification; (2) has not been convicted of council complaints a criminal offense under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and. (3) has not, more than 90 days prior to scholarships this certification, been notified of council any unpaid Federal tax assessment for which the liability remains unsatisfied, unless the assessment is the essay council subject of an installment agreement or offer in compromise that has been approved by the Internal Revenue Service and is not in default, or the assessment is the subject of a non-frivolous administrative or judicial proceeding.

Certification Regarding Unpaid Federal Tax Liability : If the proposer is essay complaints, a corporation, the essay council AOR (or equivalent) is council complaints, required to complete a certification that the scholarships corporation has no unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability. Certification Regarding Criminal Convictions : If the proposer is a corporation, the AOR (or equivalent) is required to complaints complete a certification that the corporation has not been convicted of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law within the 24 months preceding the date on which the certification is signed. Certification Regarding Dual Use Research of Concern : The AOR is required to complete a certification that the organization will be or is in compliance with all aspects of the United States Government Policy for Institutional Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of term papers resold Concern . e. Collaborators Other Affiliations Information. The following information regarding collaborators and other affiliations must be separately provided for each individual identified as senior project personnel: Collaborators and co-Editors. A list of all persons in alphabetical order (including their current organizational affiliations) who are currently, or who have been collaborators or co-authors with the individual on a project, book, article, report, abstract or paper during the 48 months preceding the complaints submission of the proposal. Also include those individuals who are currently or have been co-editors of a journal, compendium, or conference proceedings during the 24 months preceding the submission of the proposal. If there are no collaborators or co-editors to argument on smoking report, this should be so indicated. Graduate Advisors and Postdoctoral Sponsors. A list of the names of the individual’s own graduate advisor(s) and principal postdoctoral sponsor(s), and their current organizational affiliations, if known. Thesis Advisor and Postgraduate-Scholar Sponsor.

A list of all persons (including their organizational affiliations, if known), with whom the individual has had an association as thesis advisor. In addition, a list of all persons with whom the individual has had an essay, association within the last five years as a postgraduate-scholar sponsor. The information is used to help identify potential conflicts or bias in format for writing a term the selection of reviewers. See GPG Exhibit II-2 for additional information on potential reviewer conflicts. 2. Council Complaints! Sections of the essay council Proposal. The sections described below represent the body of a research proposal submitted to NSF. Council Complaints! Failure to submit the required sections will result in essay the proposal not being accepted 14 , or being returned without review. Essay Council Complaints! See GPG Chapter IV.B for additional information.

A full research proposal submitted must contain the following sections. Note that the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide may use different naming conventions, and sections may appear in a different order than in FastLane, however, the content is the same: b. Project Summary. c. Table of Contents. d. Project Description. e. References Cited. f. Biographical Sketch(es) g. Budget and Budget Justification. h. Argument On Smoking! Current and Pending Support. i. Essay Council Complaints! Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources. j. Essay! Special Information and Supplementary Documentation. Data Management Plan Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan (if applicable)

Proposal preparation instructions for RAPID, EAGER, Ideas Lab, collaborative, equipment, conference, international travel, center, and essay complaints, major research equipment and facility projects may deviate from the above content requirements. Scholarships! Program solicitations also may deviate from the above content requirements. All proposals to NSF will be reviewed using the two NSB-approved merit review criteria described in greater length in GPG Chapter III. There are four major components of the Cover Sheet. A number of the boxes contained on the Cover Sheet are pre-filled as part of the FastLane login process. Essay Complaints! The information requested on the Cover Sheet is christian scholarships, as follows: (1) Awardee Project/Performance Site Primary Location. The information on the Awardee Organization is pre-filled on the Cover Sheet based on the login information entered. (2) Program Description/Announcement/Solicitation Number. Proposers are required to select the essay council complaints applicable program description, announcement, or solicitation. Essay Complaints! If the proposal is not submitted in response to complaints a specific program description, announcement, or solicitation, proposers should select Grant Proposal Guide.

Proposers are advised to select No Closing Date when the proposal is not submitted in response to any relevant NSF funding opportunity (which includes program descriptions, announcements, or solicitations). (3) NSF Unit of Consideration. Proposers must follow instructions for selection of an applicable NSF Division/Office and Program(s) to which the proposal should be directed. (4) Remainder of the Cover Sheet. (a) Title of Proposed Project. The title of the project must be brief, scientifically or technically valid, and suitable for use in the public press. NSF may edit the title of a project prior to making an award. (b) Budget and Duration Information. The proposed duration for which support is requested should be consistent with the nature and complexity of the proposed activity. The Foundation encourages proposers to request funding for durations of three to five years when such durations are necessary for essay complaints, completion of the essay complaints proposed work and are technically and managerially advantageous.

The requested start date should allow at least six months for NSF review, processing and decision. The PI should consult his/her organization’s Sponsored Projects Office for unusual situations (e.g., a long lead time for procurement) that create problems regarding the proposed start date. Specification of a desired start date for the project is important and wind, helpful to NSF staff; however, requests for specific start dates may not be met. (c) PI Information and co-PI Information. Information (including address information) regarding the essay PI is derived from login information and is not entered when preparing the Cover Sheet. The proposal also may identify up to council complaints four additional co-PIs. Each individual's name and either NSF ID or primary registered e-mail address, must be entered in the boxes provided. (d) Previous NSF Award. If the proposal is a renewal proposal, or an accomplishment-based renewal proposal, the applicable box must be checked.

If yes, the proposer will be requested to select the applicable previous award number. Some NSF program solicitations require submission of both a preliminary and full proposal as part of the proposal process. In such cases, the following instructions apply: (i) During the preliminary proposal stage, the proposing organization should identify the essay council complaints submission as a preliminary proposal by term papers resold checking the block entitled, Preliminary Proposal on the proposal Cover Sheet; (ii) During the full proposal submission stage, the proposing organization should identify in the block entitled, Show Related Preliminary Proposal Number, the related preliminary proposal number assigned by NSF. (e) Other Federal Agencies. If the proposal is being submitted for consideration by another Federal agency, the abbreviated name(s) of the essay council complaints Federal agency(ies) must be identified in the spaces provided. (f) Awardee Organization Information.

The awardee organization name, address, DUNS number and Employer Identification Number/Taxpayer Identification Number are derived from the profile information provided by the organization or pulled by NSF from the argument essay on smoking SAM database and essay, are not entered when preparing the Cover Sheet. Profit-making organizations must identify their status by checking the appropriate boxes on the Cover Sheet, using the following guidelines: A small business must be organized for profit, independently owned and operated (not a subsidiary of or controlled by another firm), have no more than 500 employees, and not be dominant in its field. A minority business must be: (i) at in the wind essay, least 51 percent owned by one or more minority or disadvantaged individuals or, in the case of a publicly owned business, have at least 51 percent of the voting stock owned by one or more minority or disadvantaged individuals; and (ii) one whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more such individuals. A woman-owned business must be at least 51 percent owned by a woman or women, who also control and operate it. Control in this context means exercising the power to make policy decisions. Operate in this context means being actively involved in the day-to-day management. (g) Project/Performance Site Primary Location. If the project will be performed at the awardee organization, check the designated box.

If the project, however, will be performed at a location other than the essay awardee, provide the following information (where applicable): Organization Name (identify the organization name of the primary site where the work will be performed, if different than the awardee); Street; City; State; Country; and 9-digit Zip Code. For projects that support research infrastructure and tools, such as vessels, facilities, and on smoking, telescopes, the project/performance site should correspond to the physical location of the essay complaints research asset. Council! For research assets or projects that are geographically distributed, the essay proposer should report information for term resold, the primary site, as defined by council the proposer. For example, proposals for the operations and maintenance of research vessels may list the project/performance site as the vessel’s home port. (h) Other Information. Should any of the following items on the proposal Cover Sheet apply to a proposal, the applicable box(es) must be checked. Beginning Investigator (See GPG I.G.2) (Note: this box is applicable only to proposals submitted to the Biological Sciences Directorate.) Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (See GPG II.C.1.e) Proprietary or Privileged Information (See GPG I.D.3 II.C.1.d) Historic Places (See GPG II.C.2.j) Vertebrate Animals 15 (See GPG II.D.7) Human Subjects 16 (See GPG II.D.8) International Activities Country Name(s) (See GPG II.C.2.j) - For each proposal that describes an international activity, proposers should list the papers resold primary countries involved. A maximum of five countries may be listed. An international activity is defined as research, training, and/or education carried out in essay complaints cooperation with foreign counterparts either overseas or in the US using virtual technologies.

Proposers also should enter the essay country/countries with which project participants will engage and/or travel to attend international conferences. If the essay complaints specific location of the international conference is not known at the time of the proposal submission, proposers should enter Worldwide. Essay! (See GPG II.C.2.j). b. Project Summary. Each proposal must contain a summary of the complaints proposed project not more than one page in length. Christian Scholarships! The Project Summary consists of an overview, a statement on the intellectual merit of the proposed activity, and a statement on the broader impacts of the proposed activity. The overview includes a description of the complaints activity that would result if the nest essay proposal were funded and a statement of objectives and methods to be employed.

The statement on intellectual merit should describe the potential of the proposed activity to advance knowledge. The statement on broader impacts should describe the potential of the proposed activity to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of essay council complaints specific, desired societal outcomes. The Project Summary should be written in the third person, informative to other persons working in the same or related fields, and, insofar as possible, understandable to a scientifically or technically literate lay reader. It should not be an nest in the essay, abstract of the proposal. The Project Summary may ONLY be uploaded as a Supplementary Document if use of special characters is necessary. Such Project Summaries must be formatted with separate headings for Overview, Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts. Failure to include these headings will result in the proposal being returned without review. c. Essay Complaints! Table of Contents.

A Table of Contents is automatically generated for the proposal. The proposer cannot edit this form. d. Project Description (including Results from Prior NSF Support) The Project Description should provide a clear statement of the never work to be undertaken and must include the objectives for the period of the proposed work and expected significance; the relationship of this work to the present state of knowledge in the field, as well as to work in progress by the PI under other support. The Project Description should outline the general plan of work, including the council broad design of activities to be undertaken, and, where appropriate, provide a clear description of experimental methods and procedures.

Proposers should address what they want to do, why they want to do it, how they plan to do it, how they will know if they succeed, and council complaints, what benefits could accrue if the project is successful. The project activities may be based on previously established and/or innovative methods and approaches, but in either case must be well justified. These issues apply to both the technical aspects of the proposal and the way in which the project may make broader contributions. The Project Description must contain, as a separate section within the narrative, a section labeled Broader Impacts . Essay Council! This section should provide a discussion of the christian scholarships broader impacts of the proposed activities. Broader impacts may be accomplished through the research itself, through the activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to the project. NSF values the advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to the achievement of societally relevant outcomes. Such outcomes include, but are not limited to: full participation of women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); improved STEM education and educator development at any level; increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in society; development of a diverse, globally competitive STEM workforce; increased partnerships between academia, industry, and essay complaints, others; improved national security; increased economic competitiveness of the US; and enhanced infrastructure for research and education. Plans for essay council complaints, data management and sharing of the products of council complaints research, including preservation, documentation, and sharing of data, samples, physical collections, curriculum materials and essay than, other related research and education products should be described in the Special Information and essay, Supplementary Documentation section of the proposal (see GPG Chapter II.C.2.j for additional instructions for preparation of this section). (ii) Page Limitations and Inclusion of Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) within the Project Description.

Brevity will assist reviewers and Foundation staff in dealing effectively with proposals. Never! Therefore, the Project Description (including Results from Prior NSF Support, which is essay, limited to five pages) may not exceed 15 pages . Visual materials, including charts, graphs, maps, photographs and other pictorial presentations are included in the 15-page limitation. PIs are cautioned that the Project Description must be self-contained and that URLs must not be used because: 1) the information could circumvent page limitations; 2) the in the essay reviewers are under no obligation to view the sites; and 3) the sites could be altered or deleted between the time of submission and the time of review. Conformance to the 15-page limit will be strictly enforced and may not be exceeded unless a deviation has been specifically authorized. (GPG Chapter II.A contains information on deviations.) (iii) Results from Prior NSF Support. If any PI or co-PI identified on essay complaints the proposal has received NSF funding with a start date 17 in the past five years (including any current funding and no cost extensions), information on the award is essay council, required for each PI and co-PI, regardless of whether the support was directly related to the proposal or not. In cases where the essay council complaints PI or co-PI has received more than one award (excluding amendments to argument essay on smoking existing awards), they need only report on the one award most closely related to essay complaints the proposal. Funding includes not just salary support, but any funding awarded by NSF. NSF awards such as standard or continuing grants, Graduate Research Fellowship, Major Research Instrumentation, travel, conference, and center awards, etc., are subject to this requirement. The following information must be provided: (a) the NSF award number, amount and period of support; (b) the argument on smoking title of the essay council complaints project; (c) a summary of the results of the scholarships completed work, including accomplishments, supported by the award.

The results must be separately described under two distinct headings, Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts; (d) a listing of the publications resulting from the NSF award (a complete bibliographic citation for each publication must be provided either in this section or in the References Cited section of the proposal); if none, state No publications were produced under this award. (e) evidence of essay council complaints research products and their availability, including, but not limited to: data, publications, samples, physical collections, software, and models, as described in essay council complaints any Data Management Plan; and. (f) if the proposal is for renewed support, a description of the council complaints relation of the completed work to the proposed work. Reviewers will be asked to comment on the quality of the on smoking prior work described in this section of the proposal. Note that the proposal may contain up to five pages to describe the results.

Results may be summarized in fewer than five pages, which would give the balance of the 15 pages for the Project Description. (iv) Unfunded Collaborations. Any substantial collaboration with individuals not included in essay complaints the budget should be described in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal (see GPG Chapter II.C.2.i) and documented in a letter of collaboration from each collaborator. Such letters should be provided in the supplementary documentation section of the FastLane Proposal Preparation Module and follow the format instructions specified in GPG Chapter II.C.2.j. Collaborative activities that are identified in the budget should follow the instructions in GPG Chapter II.D. NSF encourages submission of proposals by groups of investigators; often these are submitted to carry out interdisciplinary projects. Unless stipulated in a specific program solicitation, however, such proposals will be subject to the 15-page Project Description limitation established in Section (ii) above. Nest In The! PIs who wish to exceed the established page limitations for the Project Description must request and receive a deviation in complaints advance of proposal submission. (GPG Chapter II.A contains information on deviations.) (vi) Proposals for Renewed Support. See GPG Chapter V for guidance on preparation of renewal proposals. e. References Cited.

Reference information is required. Each reference must include the names of all authors (in the same sequence in which they appear in the publication), the argument essay on smoking article and journal title, book title, volume number, page numbers, and year of complaints publication. (See also GPG Chapter II.C.2.d.(iii)(d)) If the proposer has a website address readily available, that information should be included in the citation. It is not NSF's intent, however, to place an in the, undue burden on council complaints proposers to search for the URL of every referenced publication. Therefore, inclusion of a website address is optional. A proposal that includes reference citation(s) that do not specify a URL is essay stronger death, not considered to essay be in violation of NSF proposal preparation guidelines and the proposal will still be reviewed. Proposers must be especially careful to follow accepted scholarly practices in providing citations for source materials relied upon christian scholarships when preparing any section of the proposal. While there is no established page limitation for the references, this section must include bibliographic citations only and must not be used to council provide parenthetical information outside of the scholarships 15-page Project Description. f. Biographical Sketch(es) (i) Senior Personnel. A biographical sketch (limited to two pages) is required for each individual identified as senior personnel. (See GPG Exhibit II-7 for the definitions of Senior Personnel.) Proposers may elect to use third-party solutions, such as NIH’s SciENcv to develop and maintain their biographical sketch. Essay Complaints! However, proposers are advised that they are still responsible for ensuring that biographical sketches created using third-party solutions are compliant with NSF proposal preparation requirements. Do not submit any personal information in never the biographical sketch.

This includes items such as: home address; home telephone, fax, or cell phone numbers; home e-mail address; drivers’ license numbers; marital status; personal hobbies; and the like. Such personal information is essay council, not appropriate for the biographical sketch and is not relevant to the merits of the proposal. Complaints! NSF is not responsible or in any way liable for the release of such material. (See also GPG Chapter III.H). (a) Professional Preparation. A list of the individual’s undergraduate and graduate education and postdoctoral training (including location) as indicated below: Inclusive Dates (years) A list, in reverse chronological order, of all the individual's academic/professional appointments beginning with the current appointment. A list of: (i) up to five products most closely related to essay complaints the proposed project; and (ii) up to five other significant products, whether or not related to the proposed project. Acceptable products must be citable and accessible including but not limited to argument publications, data sets, software, patents, and copyrights. Unacceptable products are unpublished documents not yet submitted for publication, invited lectures, and additional lists of council products.

Only the list of term never ten will be used in the review of the essay council proposal. Each product must include full citation information including (where applicable and essay love stronger, practicable) names of all authors, date of publication or release, title, title of enclosing work such as journal or book, volume, issue, pages, website and URL or other Persistent Identifier. If only publications are included, the essay council heading Publications may be used for this section of the Biographical Sketch. (d) Synergistic Activities. A list of up to five examples that demonstrate the broader impact of the individual’s professional and resold, scholarly activities that focuses on council complaints the integration and argument essay, transfer of knowledge as well as its creation. Complaints! Examples could include, among others: innovations in teaching and training (e.g., development of curricular materials and pedagogical methods); contributions to the science of argument essay on smoking learning; development and/or refinement of research tools; computation methodologies, and essay council complaints, algorithms for problem-solving; development of databases to support research and scholarships, education; broadening the participation of groups underrepresented in STEM; and complaints, service to the scientific and engineering community outside of the individual’s immediate organization. In FastLane, biographical sketches for senior personnel may no longer be grouped together and uploaded in a single PDF file associated with the PI. Each individual’s biographical sketch must be uploaded as a single PDF file or inserted as text associated with that individual. (ii) Other Personnel. For the personnel categories listed below, the proposal also may include information on exceptional qualifications that merit consideration in the evaluation of the proposal.

Such information should be clearly identified as Other Personnel biographical information and uploaded as a single PDF file in the Other Supplementary Documents section of the proposal. (a) Postdoctoral associates. (b) Other professionals. (c) Students (research assistants) (iii) Equipment Proposals. For equipment proposals, the following must be provided for each auxiliary user: (a) Short biographical sketch; and.

(b) List of up to five publications most closely related to essay complaints the proposed acquisition. Such information should be clearly identified as Equipment Proposal biographical information and essay, uploaded as a single PDF file in the Other Supplementary Documents section of the proposal. g. Budget and Budget Justification. Each proposal must contain a budget for each year of support requested. The budget justification must be no more than three pages per proposal. The amounts for each budget line item requested must be documented and argument on smoking, justified in essay complaints the budget justification as specified below. Argument Essay! For proposals that contain a subaward(s), each subaward must include a separate budget justification of no more than three pages. The proposal may request funds under any of the categories listed so long as the item and essay, amount are considered necessary, reasonable, allocable, and papers, allowable under 2 CFR § 200, Subpart E, NSF policy, and/or the program solicitation. For-profit entities are subject to essay complaints the cost principles contained in the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Part 31.

Amounts and resold, expenses budgeted also must be consistent with the proposing organization's policies and procedures and cost accounting practices used in accumulating and reporting costs. (i) Salaries and Wages (Lines A and B on the Proposal Budget) (a) Senior Personnel Salaries Wages Policy. NSF regards research as one of the normal functions of faculty members at institutions of higher education. Compensation for time normally spent on essay research within the term of christian appointment is deemed to be included within the faculty member’s regular organizational salary. As a general policy, NSF limits the complaints salary compensation requested in the proposal budget for senior personnel to scholarships no more than two months of their regular salary in any one year. This limit includes salary compensation received from all NSF-funded grants.

This effort must be documented in council accordance with 2 CFR § 200, Subpart E. Essay Complaints! If anticipated, any compensation for such personnel in complaints excess of two months must be disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and must be specifically approved by NSF in the award notice budget. 18 Under normal rebudgeting authority, as described in wind essay AAG Chapters II and essay, V, an awardee can internally approve an increase or decrease in person months devoted to christian scholarships the project after an award is made, even if doing so results in salary support for senior personnel exceeding the two month salary policy. No prior approval from NSF is necessary as long as that change would not cause the objectives or scope of the project to change. Essay Complaints! NSF prior approval is necessary if the objectives or scope of the project changes. These same general principles apply to other types of non-academic organizations. (b) Administrative and Clerical Salaries Wages Policy. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.413, the salaries of administrative and clerical staff should normally be treated as indirect (FA) costs. Direct charging of these costs may be appropriate only format paper if all the conditions identified below are met: (i) Administrative or clerical services are integral to complaints a project or activity; (ii) Individuals involved can be specifically identified with the project or activity; (iii) Such costs are explicitly included in the approved budget or have the prior written approval of the cognizant NSF Grants Officer; and. (iv) The costs are not also recovered as indirect costs. Conditions (i) and (iv) above are particularly relevant for consideration at the budget preparation stage. The names of the PI(s), faculty, and other senior personnel and the estimated number of council full-time-equivalent person-months for which NSF funding is requested, and the total amount of salaries requested per essay council, year, must be listed.

For consistency with the NSF cost sharing policy, if person months will be requested for essay love death, senior personnel, a corresponding salary amount must be entered on the budget. If no person months and essay council, no salary are being requested for senior personnel, they should be removed from never Section A of the budget. Complaints! Their name(s) will remain on the Cover Sheet and the individual(s) role on the project should be described in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal. For postdoctoral associates and other professionals, the total number of persons for each position must be listed, with the number of full-time-equivalent person-months and total amount of salaries requested per year. For graduate and undergraduate students, secretarial, clerical, technical, etc., whose time will be charged directly to the project, only the total number of persons and total amount of salaries requested per year in each category is format a term, required. Compensation classified as salary payments must be requested in the salaries and wages category. Salaries requested must be consistent with the essay council complaints organization’s regular practices. The budget justification should detail the stronger death rates of essay council pay by individual for senior personnel, postdoctoral associates, and other professionals. (d) Confidential Budgetary Information.

The proposing organization may request that salary data on christian senior personnel not be released to persons outside the Government during the review process. In such cases, the item for complaints, senior personnel salaries in the proposal may appear as a single figure and the person-months represented by format for writing paper that amount omitted. Council! If this option is exercised, senior personnel salaries and format, person-months must be itemized in a separate statement, and forwarded to NSF in essay council accordance with the instructions specified in GPG Chapter I.D.3. This statement must include all of the information requested on stronger than the proposal budget for essay, each person involved. NSF will not forward the detailed information to reviewers and will hold it privileged to the extent permitted by law. The information on argument on smoking senior personnel salaries will be used as the basis for determining the salary amounts shown in council the budget. The box for Proprietary or Privileged Information must be checked on the proposal Cover Sheet when the proposal contains confidential budgetary information. 19. (ii) Fringe Benefits (Line C on the Proposal Budget) If the proposer’s usual accounting practices provide that its contributions to love stronger than employee benefits (leave, employee insurance, social security, retirement, other payroll-related taxes, etc.) be treated as direct costs, NSF grant funds may be requested to fund fringe benefits as a direct cost. These are typically determined by application of essay a calculated fringe benefit rate for essay council complaints, a particular class of employee (full time or part-time) applied to the salaries and wages requested.

They also may be paid based on actual costs for individual employees, if that institutional policy has been approved by council complaints the cognizant federal agency. See 2 CFR § 200.431 for the definition and allowability of inclusion of fringe benefits on a proposal budget. (iii) Equipment (Line D on the Proposal Budget) Equipment is defined as tangible personal property (including information technology systems) having a useful life of more than one year and a per-unit acquisition cost which equals or exceeds the lesser of the capitalization level established by the proposer for financial statement purposes, or $5,000. Christian Scholarships! It is essay council, important to note that the in the wind essay acquisition cost of equipment includes modifications, attachments, and accessories necessary to make the property usable for council complaints, the purpose for which it will be purchased. Items of needed equipment must be adequately justified, listed individually by description and estimated cost. Allowable items ordinarily will be limited to research equipment and apparatus not already available for the conduct of the work. General purpose equipment such as office equipment and furnishings, and information technology equipment and systems are typically not eligible for direct cost support. Special purpose or scientific use computers or associated hardware and software, however, may be requested as items of essay council complaints equipment when necessary to accomplish the essay council complaints project objectives and not otherwise reasonably available. For Writing A Term Paper! Any request to essay complaints support such items must be clearly disclosed in term never resold the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and be included in the NSF award budget.

(iv) Travel (Line E on the Proposal Budget) Travel and its relation to the proposed activities must be specified, itemized and justified by destination and cost. Funds may be requested for field work, attendance at council complaints, meetings and conferences, and other travel associated with the proposed work, including subsistence. Term Papers! In order to qualify for support, however, attendance at complaints, meetings or conferences must be necessary to accomplish proposal objectives, or disseminate its results. Travel support for dependents of key project personnel may be requested only when the travel is for a duration of six months or more either by inclusion in the approved budget or with the prior written approval of the cognizant NSF Grants and Agreements Officer. Love Stronger Than! Temporary dependent care costs above and beyond regular dependent care that directly result from travel to conferences are allowable costs provided that the essay council conditions established in 2 CFR § 200.474 are met. Allowance for air travel normally will not exceed the cost of round-trip, economy airfares. Persons traveling under NSF grants must travel by US-Flag Air carriers, if available. (b) Domestic Travel. Domestic travel includes travel within and love stronger death, between the US, its territories and possessions. 20.

(c) Foreign Travel. Travel outside the areas specified above is considered foreign travel. Council! The proposal must include relevant information, including countries to be visited (also enter names of countries on essay on smoking the proposal budget), dates of visit, if known. (v) Participant Support (Line F on the Proposal Budget) This budget category refers to direct costs for items such as stipends or subsistence allowances, travel allowances, and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with NSF-sponsored conferences or training projects. Any additional categories of participant support costs other than those described in 2 CFR § 200.75 (such as incentives, gifts, souvenirs, t-shirts and council complaints, memorabilia), must be justified in love stronger the budget justification, and such costs will be closely scrutinized by NSF. (See GPG Chapter II.D.9). Essay Complaints! For some educational projects conducted at local school districts, however, the love than death participants being trained are employees. Essay Complaints! In such cases, the costs must be classified as participant support if payment is made through a stipend or training allowance method. The school district must have an in the essay, accounting mechanism in place (i.e., sub-account code) to council complaints differentiate between regular salary and stipend payments. To help defray the costs of participating in a conference or training activity, funds may be proposed for payment of stipends, per council complaints, diem or subsistence allowances, based on essay the type and scholarships, duration of the activity. Such allowances must be reasonable, in essay conformance with the policy of the proposing organization and limited to the days of attendance at term never, the conference plus the actual travel time required to reach the conference location.

Where meals or lodgings are furnished without charge or at essay council complaints, a nominal cost (e.g., as part of the registration fee), the per diem or subsistence allowance should be correspondingly reduced. Although local participants may participate in conference meals and coffee breaks, funds may not be proposed to pay per diem or similar expenses for local participants in the conference. Funds may be requested for the travel costs of participants. If so, the restrictions regarding class of accommodations and use of US-Flag air carriers are applicable. 21 In training activities that involve field trips, costs of transportation of participants are allowable.

The number of participants to be supported must be entered in the parentheses on love than the proposal budget. Essay Council Complaints! Participant support costs must be specified, itemized and justified in the budget justification section of the format paper proposal. Essay Council Complaints! Indirect costs (FA) are not allowed on participant support costs. Participant support costs must be accounted for argument essay on smoking, separately should an award be made. (vi) Other Direct Costs (Lines G1 through G6 on the Proposal Budget) Any costs proposed to an NSF grant must be allowable, reasonable and directly allocable to the supported activity. The budget must identify and itemize other anticipated direct costs not included under the complaints headings above, including materials and supplies, publication costs, computer services and consultant services. Examples include aircraft rental, space rental at research establishments away from the grantee organization, minor building alterations, payments to human subjects, and service charges. Reference books and argument on smoking, periodicals may be charged to the grant only if they are specifically allocable to the project being supported by NSF.

(a) Materials and Supplies (including Costs of Computing Devices) (Line G1 on the Proposal Budget) The proposal budget justification should indicate the general types of expendable materials and supplies required. Essay Complaints! Supplies are defined as all tangible personal property other than those described in paragraph (d)(iii) above. A computing device is considered a supply if the acquisition cost is less than the lesser of the capitalization level established by papers resold the proposer or $5,000, regardless of the length of its useful life. In the council specific case of computing devices, charging as a direct cost is allowable for devices that are essential and allocable, but not solely dedicated, to the performance of the NSF award. Cost estimates must be included for items that represent a substantial amount of the proposed line item cost. (b) Publication/Documentation/Dissemination (Line G2 on the Proposal Budget) The proposal budget may request funds for the costs of documenting, preparing, publishing or otherwise making available to others the findings and products of the work conducted under the grant. This generally includes the following types of activities: reports, reprints, page charges or other journal costs (except costs for prior or early publication); necessary illustrations; cleanup, documentation, storage and indexing of data and databases; development, documentation and debugging of software; and storage, preservation, documentation, indexing, etc., of physical specimens, collections or fabricated items.

(c) Consultant Services (also referred to as Professional Service Costs) (Line G3 on papers resold the Proposal Budget) The proposal budget may request costs for professional and council, consultant services. Professional and consultant services are services rendered by persons who are members of a particular profession or possess a special skill, and who are not officers or employees of the proposing organization. Costs of professional and consultant services are allowable when reasonable in relation to on smoking the services rendered and when not contingent upon recovery of costs from the Federal government. Anticipated services must be justified and information furnished on each individual’s expertise, primary organizational affiliation, normal daily compensation rate, and number of days of expected service. Council! Consultants’ travel costs, including subsistence, may be included. If requested, the proposer must be able to justify that the proposed rate of pay is reasonable. Additional information on the allowability of consultant or professional service costs is available in 2 CFR § 200.459. In addition to other provisions required by the proposing organization, all contracts made under the NSF award must contain the applicable provisions identified in 2 CFR § 200 Appendix II. (d) Computer Services (Line G4 on the Proposal Budget) he cost of argument computer services, including computer-based retrieval of scientific, technical and educational information, may be requested only essay where it is institutional policy to charge such costs as direct charges.

A justification based on the established computer service rates at the proposing organization must be included. Format For Writing Paper! The proposal budget also may request costs for leasing of computer equipment. As noted in GPG Chapter II.C.2.g(iii), general purpose (such as word processing, spreadsheets, communication) computer equipment should not be requested. Note: See paragraph (a) above for guidance on acquisition of computing devices. (e) Subawards 22 (Line G5 on the Proposal Budget) Except for council complaints, the purchase of materials and supplies, equipment or general support services allowable under the grant, no portion of the proposed activity may be subawarded, transferred, or contracted out to another organization without written prior NSF authorization. Term Papers Never Resold! Such authorization must be provided either through inclusion of the subaward(s) on an NSF award budget or by receiving written prior approval from the cognizant NSF Grants and Agreements Officer. If known at the time of proposal submission, the intent to enter into essay council such arrangements must be disclosed in the proposal.

A separate budget and council, a budget justification of no more than three pages, must be provided for each subrecipient, if already identified, along with a description of the work to be performed. All proposing organizations are required to make a case-by-case determination regarding the role of a subrecipient versus contractor for each agreement it makes. 2 CFR § 200.330 provides characteristics of each type of arrangement to assist proposing organizations in making that determination. However, inclusion of a subaward or contract in the proposal budget or submission of council complaints a request after issuance of an for writing, NSF award to add a subaward or contract will document the organizational determination required. It is NSF’s expectation that, consistent with 2 CFR § 200.414, NSF awardees will use the domestic subrecipient’s applicable US federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s). Essay Complaints! If no such rate exists, the NSF awardee may either negotiate a rate or will fund the subrecipient using the de minimis indirect cost rate recovery of 10% of modified total direct costs. It is also NSF’s expectation that NSF awardees will use the foreign subrecipient’s applicable US federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s). However, if no such rate exists, the NSF awardee will fund the foreign subrecipient using the christian de minimis indirect cost rate recovery of 10% of modified total direct costs. (f) Other (Line G6 on essay the Proposal Budget) Any other direct costs not specified in Lines G1 through G5 must be identified on Line G6. Such costs must be itemized and detailed in the budget justification.

(vii) Total Direct Costs (Line H on the Proposal Budget) The total amount of direct costs requested in the budget, to include Lines A through G, must be entered on term papers Line H. (viii) Indirect Costs (also known as Facilities and Administrative Costs (FA) for Colleges and Universities) (Line I on the Proposal Budget) Except where specifically identified in an NSF program solicitation, the applicable US federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s) must be used in computing indirect costs (FA) for a proposal. The amount for essay council complaints, indirect costs should be calculated by applying the current negotiated indirect cost rate(s) to the approved base(s). Indirect cost recovery for colleges, universities, and other organizations of higher education are additionally restricted by christian scholarships 2 CFR § 200, Appendix III, paragraph C.7. which specifies Federal agencies are required to use the negotiated FA rate that is in effect at the time of the initial award throughout the life of the essay council complaints sponsored agreement. Additional information on the charging of indirect costs to format for writing a term an NSF award is complaints, available in AAG Chapter V.D. Domestic proposing organizations that do not have a current negotiated rate agreement with a cognizant Federal agency, and who are requesting more than a de minimis 10% recovery of for writing a term modified total direct costs should prepare an indirect cost proposal based on expenditures for its most recently ended fiscal year.

Based on the information provided in the indirect cost proposal, NSF may negotiate an council complaints, award-specific rate to be used only on the award currently being considered for funding. No supporting documentation is required for proposed rates of 10% or less of modified total direct costs. The contents and financial data included in stronger than death indirect cost proposals vary according to the make-up of the proposing organization. Instructions for preparing an indirect cost rate proposal can be found at: http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/caar/docs/idcsubmissions.pdf. NSF formally negotiates indirect cost rates for the organizations for which NSF has rate cognizance. NSF does not negotiate rates for organizations that are not direct recipients of NSF funding (e.g., subrecipients).

The prime recipient is responsible for ensuring that proposed subrecipient costs, including indirect costs, are reasonable and appropriate. Foreign organizations that do not have a current US federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s) are limited to essay complaints a de minimis indirect cost rate recovery of 10% of modified total direct costs. Foreign grantees that have a US federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s) may recover indirect costs at the current negotiated rate. (ix) Total Direct and Indirect Costs (FA) (Line J on the Proposal Budget) The total amount of direct and indirect costs (FA) (sum of Lines H and I) must be entered on Line J. (x) Amount of This Request (Line L on the Proposal Budget) The total amount of funds requested by the proposer should be the same as the amount entered on Line J. (xi) Cost Sharing (Line M on the Proposal Budget) The National Science Board issued a report entitled “Investing in the Future: NSF Cost Sharing Policies for a Robust Federal Research Enterprise”(NSB 09-20, August 3, 2009), which contained eight recommendations for NSF regarding cost sharing. In implementation of the council Board’s recommendation, NSF’s guidance 23 is as follows: Voluntary Committed and essay, Uncommitted Cost Sharing. Inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited and Line M on the proposal budget will not be available for use by the proposer.

While not required by format a term paper NSF, awardee organizations may, at their own discretion, continue to contribute voluntary uncommitted cost sharing to NSF-sponsored projects. These resources are not auditable by NSF and should not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. In order for NSF, and its reviewers, to assess the scope of complaints a proposed project, all organizational resources necessary for, and available to, a project must be described in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal (see GPG Chapter II.C.2.i for death, further information). NSF Program Officers are not authorized to impose or encourage cost sharing unless such requirements are explicitly included in the program solicitation. Mandatory Cost Sharing. Mandatory cost sharing will only essay complaints be required for NSF programs when explicitly authorized by the NSF Director, the National Science Board, or legislation. A complete listing of NSF programs that require cost sharing is available on format for writing the NSF website at: http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/. In those rare instances, cost sharing requirements will be clearly identified in the solicitation and must be included on Line M of the council proposed budget. For purposes of nest in the wind budget preparation, the essay council cumulative cost sharing amount must be entered on Line M of the first year’s budget. Should an award be made, the organization’s cost sharing commitment, as specified on the first year’s approved budget, must be met prior to the award end date. Such cost sharing will be an eligibility, rather than a review criterion.

Proposers are advised not to christian exceed the mandatory cost sharing level or amount specified in essay the solicitation. Nest Wind! 24. When mandatory cost sharing is included on Line M, and essay council, accepted by the Foundation, the argument essay commitment of funds becomes legally binding and is subject to audit. When applicable, the estimated value of any in-kind contributions also should be included on council complaints Line M. An explanation of the source, nature, amount and availability of any proposed cost sharing must be provided in the budget justification 25 . It should be noted that contributions derived from other Federal funds or counted as cost sharing toward projects of another Federal agency must not be counted towards meeting the specific cost sharing requirements of the NSF award. Failure to essay stronger than death provide the level of cost sharing required by the NSF solicitation and reflected in complaints the NSF award budget may result in termination of the NSF award, disallowance of award costs and/or refund of award funds to NSF by the awardee.

(xii) Allowable and Unallowable Costs. 2 CFR § 200, Subpart E provides comprehensive information regarding costs allowable under Federal awards. The following categories of unallowable costs are highlighted because of their sensitivity: Costs of entertainment, amusement, diversion and social activities, and any costs directly associated with such activities (such as tickets to shows or sporting events, meals, lodging, rentals, transportation and gratuities) are unallowable. Christian! Travel, meal and hotel expenses of essay council grantee employees who are not on essay council complaints travel status are unallowable. Costs of employees on travel status are limited to council complaints those specifically authorized by 2 CFR § 200.474. (b) Meals and Coffee Breaks. No funds may be requested for meals or coffee breaks for on smoking, intramural meetings of an organization or any of its components, including, but not limited to, laboratories, departments and complaints, centers. )See 2 CFR 200.432, for additional information on the charging of certain types of costs generally associated with conferences supported by NSF.) (c) Alcoholic Beverages.

No NSF funds may be spent on alcoholic beverages. h. Format! Current and Pending Support. This section of the proposal calls for required information on all current and pending support for ongoing projects and council, proposals, including this project , and any subsequent funding in the case of continuing grants. All current project support from whatever source (e.g., Federal, State, local or foreign government agencies, public or private foundations, industrial or other commercial organizations, or internal funds allocated toward specific projects) must be listed. Council Complaints! The proposed project and council complaints, all other projects or activities requiring a portion of time of the PI and other senior personnel must be included, even if they receive no salary support from the project(s).

The total award amount for the entire award period covered (including indirect costs) must be shown as well as the argument on smoking number of person-months per year to be devoted to the project, regardless of source of support. Similar information must be provided for all proposals already submitted or submitted concurrently to essay council other possible sponsors, including NSF. Concurrent submission of a proposal to other organizations will not prejudice its review by NSF. The Biological Sciences Directorate exception to this policy is council, delineated in GPG Chapter I.G.2. If the project now being submitted has been funded previously by a source other than NSF, the information requested in essay complaints the paragraph above must be furnished for the last period of funding. In FastLane, current and pending support for all senior personnel may no longer be grouped together and complaints, uploaded in a single PDF file associated with the PI. Each individual’s current and pending support must be uploaded as a single PDF file or inserted as text associated with that individual. i. Essay Council! Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources.

This section of the essay proposal is used to assess the adequacy of the resources available to perform the effort proposed to satisfy both the council Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts review criteria. Proposers should describe only those resources that are directly applicable. Never Resold! Proposers should include an aggregated description of the internal and essay complaints, external resources (both physical and personnel) that the organization and its collaborators will provide to the project, should it be funded. Term Never Resold! Such information must be provided in this section, in lieu of essay other parts of the proposal (e.g., budget justification, project description). The description should be narrative in nature and must not include any quantifiable financial information. Reviewers will evaluate the information during the merit review process and the cognizant NSF Program Officer will review it for programmatic and technical sufficiency. Although these resources are not considered cost sharing as defined in 2 CFR § 200.306, the Foundation does expect that the resources identified in the Facilities, Equipment, and Other Resources section will be provided, or made available, should the proposal be funded. AAG Chapter II.B.1 specifies procedures for use by paper the awardee when there are postaward changes to objectives, scope or methods/procedures. j. Special Information and Supplementary Documentation. Except as specified below, special information and council complaints, supplementary documentation must be included as part of the Project Description (or part of the budget justification), if it is relevant to determining the quality of the on smoking proposed work. Information submitted in the following areas is not considered part of the 15-page Project Description limitation.

This Special Information and Supplementary Documentation section also is not considered an appendix. Specific guidance on the need for additional documentation may be obtained from the organization’s sponsored projects office or in the references cited below. Postdoctoral Researcher Mentoring Plan. Each proposal 26 that requests funding to support postdoctoral researchers 27 must include, as a supplementary document, a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided for such individuals. In no more than one page, the mentoring plan must describe the mentoring that will be provided to council all postdoctoral researchers supported by the project, regardless of whether they reside at the submitting organization, any subrecipient organization, or at any organization participating in a simultaneously submitted collaborative project.

Proposers are advised that the mentoring plan must not be used to circumvent the 15-page Project Description limitation. See GPG Chapter II.D.5 for additional information on collaborative proposals. Stronger Than! Mentoring activities provided to postdoctoral researchers supported on the project will be evaluated under the Broader Impacts review criterion. Examples of mentoring activities include, but are not limited to: career counseling; training in essay complaints preparation of grant proposals, publications and presentations; guidance on ways to improve teaching and mentoring skills; guidance on how to effectively collaborate with researchers from diverse backgrounds and essay on smoking, disciplinary areas; and council, training in responsible professional practices. Plans for data management and sharing of the products of research. Essay! Proposals must include a supplementary document of no more than two pages labeled Data Management Plan. This supplementary document should describe how the proposal will conform to NSF policy on council complaints the dissemination and sharing of term never resold research results (see AAG Chapter VI.D.4), and may include: the types of data, samples, physical collections, software, curriculum materials, and other materials to be produced in council complaints the course of the project; the standards to be used for data and metadata format and content (where existing standards are absent or deemed inadequate, this should be documented along with any proposed solutions or remedies); policies for access and sharing including provisions for appropriate protection of privacy, confidentiality, security, intellectual property, or other rights or requirements; policies and provisions for re-use, re-distribution, and the production of derivatives; and. plans for archiving data, samples, and other research products, and for on smoking, preservation of access to them. Data management requirements and plans specific to the Directorate, Office, Division, Program, or other NSF unit, relevant to a proposal are available at: http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp. If guidance specific to the program is not available, then the requirements established in essay council complaints this section apply. Simultaneously submitted collaborative proposals and format paper, proposals that include subawards are a single unified project and should include only one supplemental combined Data Management Plan, regardless of the number of non-lead collaborative proposals or subawards included.

A valid Data Management Plan may include only the council statement that no detailed plan is needed, as long as the statement is argument essay on smoking, accompanied by a clear justification. Proposers who feel that the plan cannot fit within the council limit of two pages may use part of the 15-page Project Description for additional data management information. Proposers are advised that the in the wind Data Management Plan must not be used to council complaints circumvent the 15-page Project Description limitation. The Data Management Plan will be reviewed as an integral part of the proposal, considered under Intellectual Merit or Broader Impacts or both, as appropriate for the scientific community of relevance. Rationale for performance of on smoking all or part of the project off-campus or away from organizational headquarters. Documentation of collaborative arrangements of significance to the proposal through letters of complaints collaboration. (See GPG Chapter II.C.2.d(iv)). Letters of collaboration should be limited to stating the intent to collaborate and should not contain endorsements or evaluation of the proposed project. The recommended format for letters of collaboration is as follows:

If the proposal submitted by format Dr. Essay! [insert the christian full name of the Principal Investigator] entitled [insert the proposal title] is selected for funding by complaints NSF, it is my intent to collaborate and/or commit resources as detailed in the Project Description or the council complaints Facilities, Equipment or Other Resources section of the proposal. While letters of collaboration are permitted, unless required by a specific program solicitation, letters of support should not be submitted as they are not a standard component of an NSF proposal. Letters of support are typically from a key stakeholder such as an organization, collaborator or Congressional Representative, and essay council, are used to convey a sense of enthusiasm for scholarships, the project and/or to highlight the qualifications of the essay council PI or co-PI. Letters of nest in the wind essay support submitted in response to a program solicitation requirement must be unique to complaints the specific proposal submitted and cannot be altered without the author’s explicit prior approval. In order for NSF to comply with federal environmental statutes (including, but not limited to, the National Environmental Policy Act [42 U.S.C. Essay Love Stronger Than! §§ 4321, et seq .], the National Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C. § 470, et seq .], and the Endangered Species Act [16 U.S.C. §§ 1531, et seq .], the essay council complaints proposer may be requested to submit supplemental post-proposal submission information to NSF in order that a reasonable and accurate assessment of environmental impacts by papers NSF may be made. International Research/Education/Training Activities. For each proposal that describes an international activity, PIs should list the essay council primary countries involved on the Cover Sheet.

An international activity is christian scholarships, defined as research, training, and/or education carried out in cooperation with foreign counterparts either overseas or in the US using virtual technologies. International Conferences. Proposers also should enter on the Cover Sheet the council complaints country/countries with which project participants will engage and/or travel to attend international conferences. Scholarships! If the specific location of the international conference is not known at the time of the council complaints proposal submission, proposers should enter Worldwide on format for writing the Cover Sheet. Work in foreign countries. Council Complaints! Some governments require nonresidents to obtain official approval to carry out nest wind essay investigations within their borders and council, coastal waters under their jurisdiction. PIs are responsible for obtaining the required authorizations. Advance coordination should minimize disruption of the research. (See AAG Chapter VI.B.4.) Antarctic proposals to death any NSF program require operational worksheets by the first Wednesday of essay June in the year before any proposed fieldwork. Essay Than! See proposals with fieldwork in Chapter V.A of Antarctic Research. Council! Special budget considerations also apply. (See also Chapter V.B of Antarctic Research.)

Research in a location designated, or eligible to be designated, a registered historic place. (See AAG Chapter VI.K). Where applicable, the box for essay stronger, Historic Places must be checked on the proposal Cover Sheet. Research involving field experiments with genetically engineered organisms. (See AAG Chapter VI.B.2) Documentation regarding research involving the use of human subjects, hazardous materials, vertebrate animals, or endangered species. (See AAG Chapter VI.B. and GPG Chapter II.D.7 and II.D.8). Projects that involve technology utilization/transfer activities, that require a management plan, or that involve special reports or final products. Please note that some program solicitations provide specific guidance on preparation and inclusion of council management plans in essay complaints proposals submitted to NSF. Special components in essay council complaints new proposals or in requests for supplements, such as Facilitation Awards for christian scholarships, Scientists and essay complaints, Engineers with Disabilities (FASED), Research Opportunity Awards (ROAs), Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs), or Facilitating Research at scholarships, Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (RUIs and ROAs). Essay! (See GPG Chapter II.D.4 for essay stronger, information on FASED, and for council, the other programs identified, consult the love relevant program solicitation.) In addition, the supplementary documentation section should alert NSF officials to essay council unusual circumstances that require special handling, including, for example, proprietary or other privileged information in in the wind essay the proposal, matters affecting individual privacy, required intergovernmental review under E.O. Complaints! 12372 (Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs) for activities that directly affect State or local governments, or possible national security implications.

All information necessary for the review of a proposal must be contained in Sections A through I of the term papers proposal. Essay Council Complaints! Appendices may not be included unless a deviation has been authorized . GPG Chapter II.A contains further information. D. Special Guidelines. 1. Rapid Response Research (RAPID) Proposals. The RAPID funding mechanism is used for proposals having a severe urgency with regard to availability of, or access to, data, facilities or specialized equipment, including quick-response research on term natural or anthropogenic disasters and similar unanticipated events. PI(s) must contact the NSF program officer(s) whose expertise is most germane to the proposal topic before submitting a RAPID proposal. Council Complaints! This will facilitate determining whether the proposed work is appropriate for RAPID funding. The Project Description is expected to be brief and must be no more than five pages. It must include clear statements as to why the proposed research is of an urgent nature and why a RAPID award would be the most appropriate mechanism for supporting the proposed work. Note this proposal preparation instruction deviates from the argument standard proposal preparation instructions contained in this Guide; RAPID proposals must otherwise be compliant with the GPG. The RAPID proposal type must be selected in complaints the proposal preparation module in FastLane.

Only internal merit review is required for RAPID proposals. Nest In The! Under rare circumstances, program officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. If external review is to be obtained, then the PI will be informed in the interest of maintaining the transparency of the review and recommendation process. The two standard NSB-approved merit review criteria will apply. Requests may be for up to $200K and of one year duration.

The award size, however, will be consistent with the project scope and complaints, of a size comparable to grants in similar areas. No-cost extensions and requests for supplemental funding will be processed in accordance with standard NSF policies and procedures. Renewed funding of RAPID awards may be requested only through submission of a proposal that will be subject to full external merit review. Such proposals would be designated as RAPID renewals. 2. EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER) Proposals.

The EAGER funding mechanism may be used to support exploratory work in on smoking its early stages on untested, but potentially transformative, research ideas or approaches. This work may be considered especially high risk-high payoff in the sense that it, for example, involves radically different approaches, applies new expertise, or engages novel disciplinary or interdisciplinary perspectives. These exploratory proposals also may be submitted directly to an NSF program, but the complaints EAGER mechanism should not be used for complaints, projects that are appropriate for submission as regular (i.e., non-EAGER) NSF proposals. PI(s) must contact the NSF program officer(s) whose expertise is most germane to the proposal topic prior to submission of an EAGER proposal. This will aid in essay determining the appropriateness of the work for papers resold, consideration under the EAGER mechanism; this suitability must be assessed early in the process. The Project Description is essay council complaints, expected to be brief and must be no more than eight pages. It must include clear statements as to christian scholarships why this project is appropriate for complaints, EAGER funding, including why it does not fit into existing programs and why it is a good fit for EAGER. Note this proposal preparation instruction deviates from the standard proposal preparation instructions contained in this Guide; EAGER proposals must otherwise be compliant with the GPG. The EAGER proposal type must be selected in format for writing paper the proposal preparation module in FastLane.

Only internal merit review is required for EAGER proposals. Under rare circumstances, program officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. If external review is to complaints be obtained, then the nest in the PI will be informed in the interest of maintaining the transparency of the review and essay, recommendation process. The two standard NSB-approved merit review criteria will apply. Requests may be for up to $300K and of up to a term two years duration. The award size, however, will be consistent with the complaints project scope and of a size comparable to grants in similar areas. No-cost extensions and requests for supplemental funding will be processed in accordance with standard NSF policies and procedures.

Renewed funding of EAGER awards may be requested only essay through submission of a proposal that will be subject to full external merit review. Such proposals would be designated as EAGER renewals. The Ideas Lab is a funding mechanism designed to support the development and implementation of complaints creative and format for writing paper, innovative project ideas that have the potential to complaints transform research paradigms and/or solve intractable problems. An Ideas Lab may be run independently, or in parallel, with the issuance of an NSF funding opportunity on the same topic. These project ideas typically will be high-risk/high-impact, as they represent new and unproven ideas, approaches and/or technologies. This mechanism was developed collaboratively within NSF, modeled on the sandpit workshops that are a key component of the United Kingdom Research Council’s IDEAs Factory program. The implementation of the Ideas Lab mechanism is a four-stage process as described below: a. Stage 1: Selection of Panelists. There are two separate panels convened for an Ideas Lab: a selection panel and an Ideas Lab panel. The role of the selection panel is to provide advice on the selection of participants. The role of the Ideas Lab panel is to provide an assessment of the project ideas developed there.

The individuals selected to participate in each of these panels are subject matter experts for the specific topic of the Ideas Lab. All panelists are barred from receiving any research funding through, or in christian any other way collaborating on, the essay particular Ideas Lab in which they are involved. b. Stage 2: Selection of Participants. A call for complaints, participants solicitation that describes the council specific focus of the essay Ideas Lab will be issued. The solicitation will specify the content and submission instructions for such applications. The project description is limited to two pages and should include information regarding the applicant’s specific expertise and interest in the topic area, as well as about certain personal attributes that enhance the success of the Ideas Lab workshop mechanism (e.g., experience and interest in council working in argument on smoking teams, communication skills, level of creativity, willingness to take risks). Applicants also must include a Biographical Sketch and Current and Pending Support information (both of council which must be prepared in accordance with standard NSF formatting guidelines). All other elements of a full proposal are waived (i.e., Project Summary, References Cited, Budget and essay stronger than death, Budget Justification, Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources).

The application must be submitted as a preliminary proposal in FastLane. No appendices or supplementary documents may be submitted. Applicants are notified electronically of NSF’s decision regarding whether they are invited or not invited to participate in the Ideas Lab. Applicants will be informed about the context of the review and essay, the criteria that were used to assess the essay council applications in essay council the form of a panel summary, but will not receive individual reviews or other review-related feedback. c. Stage 3: Ideas Lab.

The agenda and duration 28 of the Ideas Lab are communicated to meeting participants by the cognizant NSF Program Officer. Anonymous real-time peer review involving the participants and the Ideas Lab panel is incorporated into term never resold the workshop format, providing iterative constructive feedback during the development of project ideas. The Ideas Lab concept incorporates a guided creativity process, thus the use of a facilitator(s) is included, both to guide the creation of interdisciplinary teams and the creative development of ideas, and to ensure that the workshop progresses in a productive manner. At the end of the essay complaints Ideas Lab, the Ideas Lab panel will provide a consensus report summarizing their evaluation of term each project idea. The recommendations of the Ideas Lab panel are advisory to complaints NSF. Within seven to fourteen days following the Ideas Lab, the NSF Program Officers will determine which project ideas are meritorious and should be invited as full proposals. Essay! At the NSF Program Officers’ discretion (subject to Division Director concurrence), they may invite none, some, or all of the project ideas as full proposals, with the final funding decision to occur after the full proposals have been received and reviewed.

Invited full proposals (which are prepared in accordance with standard research proposal formatting guidelines) must be submitted within two months of receiving NSF notification after the Ideas Lab. d. Stage 4: Review and recommendation of full proposals. Invited proposals will be reviewed internally by the cognizant NSF Program Officers, the Ideas Lab panelists, and essay council complaints, other external reviewers, as appropriate. Resulting awards will be administered in accordance with standard NSF policies and procedures, including no-cost extensions and supplemental funding requests. Renewed funding of an Ideas Lab award may be requested only through submission of a full proposal that will be subject to external merit review.

Such proposals would be designated as an christian scholarships, Ideas Lab renewal. 4. Facilitation Awards for essay council complaints, Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) As part of format a term paper its effort to complaints promote full utilization of highly qualified scientists, mathematicians, and christian, engineers, and to develop scientific and essay council, technical talent, the Foundation has the following goals: to reduce or remove barriers to participation in research and training by persons with physical disabilities by providing special equipment and essay council, assistance under awards made by NSF; and. to encourage persons with disabilities to pursue careers in science and council, engineering by stimulating the development and nest, demonstration of special equipment that facilitates their work performance. Persons with disabilities eligible for facilitation awards include PIs, other senior personnel, and graduate and undergraduate students. The cognizant NSF Program Officer will make decisions regarding what constitutes appropriate support on a case-by-case basis. Complaints! The specific nature, purpose, and need for equipment or assistance should be described in sufficient detail in in the wind the proposal to essay council permit evaluation by knowledgeable reviewers. There is no separate program for funding of special equipment or assistance. Requests are made in essay conjunction with regular competitive proposals, or as a supplemental funding request to essay council complaints an existing NSF award.

Specific instructions for each type of in the essay request are provided below. a. Council Complaints! Requests as part of a competitive proposal submission. Funds may be requested to purchase special equipment, modify equipment or provide services required specifically for the work to be undertaken. Requests for funds for equipment or assistance that compensate in a general way for the disabling condition are not permitted. For example, funds may be requested to christian scholarships provide: prosthetic devices to manipulate a particular apparatus; equipment to essay council complaints convert sound to visual signals, or vice versa, for a particular experiment; access to a special site or to a mode of transportation (except as defined below); a reader or interpreter with special technical competence related to the project; or other special-purpose equipment or assistance needed to term papers conduct a particular project. Items, however, such as standard wheel chairs, prosthetics, hearing aids, TDD/text-phones, or general readers for the blind would not be supported because the need for them is not specific to the proposed project. Essay Complaints! Similarly, ramps, elevators, or other structural modifications of research facilities are not eligible for term papers, direct support under this program. No maximum funding amount has been established for such requests.

It is expected, however, that the cost (including equipment adaptation and installation) will not be a major component of the essay council complaints total proposed budget for for writing a term, the project. Requests for essay council, funds for special equipment or assistance to christian facilitate the participation of individuals with disabilities should be included in the proposed budget for essay council complaints, the project and documented in never resold the budget justification. The specific nature, purpose and need for such equipment or assistance should be described in sufficient detail in council complaints the Project Description to permit evaluation of the for writing a term paper request by knowledgeable reviewers. b. Supplemental funding requests to existing NSF grants. Supplemental funds for special equipment or assistance to facilitate participation in NSF-supported projects by persons with disabilities may be provided under existing NSF grants. Normally, title is vested in the grantee organization for equipment purchased in conjunction with NSF-supported activities. In accordance with the council applicable grant terms and conditions, the grantee organization guarantees use of the equipment for the specific project during the period of term never work funded by the Foundation, and assures its use in an appropriate manner after project completion. In instances involving special equipment for persons with disabilities, the council complaints need for such may be unique to the individual. Papers Never Resold! In such cases, the grantee organization may elect to complaints transfer title to the individual to essay love stronger death assure appropriate use after project completion. Supplemental funding requests should be submitted by using the ”Supplemental Funding Request” function in FastLane and should include a brief description of the request, a budget and a budget justification. Requests must be submitted at least two months before funds are needed.

Funding decisions will be made on the basis of the justification and availability of essay program funds with any resultant funding provided through a formal amendment of the existing NSF grant. 5. Collaborative Proposal. A collaborative proposal is one in which investigators from two or more organizations wish to collaborate on a unified research project. Collaborative proposals may be submitted to NSF in for writing a term one of two methods: as a single proposal, in which a single award is being requested (with subawards administered by the lead organization); or by simultaneous submission of proposals from different organizations, with each organization requesting a separate award. In either case, the lead organization’s proposal must contain all of the requisite sections as a single package to be provided to reviewers (that will happen automatically when procedures below are followed).

All collaborative proposals must clearly describe the roles to be played by the other organizations, specify the essay council managerial arrangements, and essay, explain the advantages of the multi-organizational effort within the Project Description. PIs are strongly encouraged to contact the cognizant NSF Program Officer prior to complaints submission of a collaborative proposal. a. Submission of a collaborative proposal from paper one organization. The single proposal method allows investigators from two or more organizations who have developed an integrated research project to submit a single, focused proposal. Essay Council! A single investigator bears primary responsibility for papers never, the administration of the grant and discussions with NSF, and, at the discretion of the organizations involved, investigators from any of the participating organizations may be designated as co-PIs. Note, however, that if awarded, a single award would be made to the submitting organization, with any collaborators listed as subawards. (See GPG Chapter II.C.2.g(vi)(e) for additional instructions on essay council preparation of on smoking this type of council complaints proposal.)

If a proposed subaward includes funding to support postdoctoral researchers, the mentoring activities to be provided for such individuals must be incorporated in the supplemental mentoring plan outlined in GPG Chapter II.C.2.j. b. Submission of a collaborative proposal from multiple organizations. Simultaneous submission of council proposals allows multiple organizations to submit a unified set of certain proposal sections, as well as information unique to each organization as specified below. All collaborative proposals arranged as separate submissions from multiple organizations must be submitted via FastLane. For these proposals, the project title must begin with the words Collaborative Research:” If funded, each organization bears responsibility for a separate award. Required sections of the proposal differ based on the organization’s role. The following sections are required for a collaborative proposal submitted by: Table of Contents (automatically generated) Table of essay Contents (automatically generated) Budget and Budget Justification. Current and Pending Support.

Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources. Budget and Budget Justification. Current and Pending Support. Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources. Data Management Plan. Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan (if applicable) See GPG Chapter II.C.2.j for additional guidance on mentoring and data management plan requirements for collaborative proposals. NSF will combine the proposal submission for printing or electronic viewing. To submit the collaborative proposal, the following process must be completed: 29.

(i) Each non-lead organization must assign their proposal a proposal PIN. This proposal PIN and the temporary proposal ID generated by FastLane when the papers never non-lead proposal is created must be provided to the lead organization before the lead organization submits its proposal to essay NSF. (ii) The lead organization must then enter each non-lead organization(s) proposal PIN and essay complaints, temporary proposal ID into the FastLane lead proposal by using the essay council complaints Link Collaborative Proposals option found on the FastLane Form Preparation screen. Given that such separately submitted proposals constitute a single proposal submission to format a term NSF, it is imperative that the proposals be submitted within a reasonable timeframe to one another. (iii) All components of the collaborative proposal must meet any established deadline date and time 30 , and failure to essay do so may result in nest wind essay the entire collaborative proposal being returned without review. (iv) If funded, both lead and non-lead organizations are required to submit separate annual and final project reports.

These reports should reference the work of the council collaborative, while focusing on the distinct work conducted at each funded organization. 6. Essay Council Complaints! Equipment Proposals. Proposals for specialized equipment may be submitted by an organization for: individual investigators; groups of investigators within the same department; several departments; organization(s) participating in a collaborative or joint arrangement; any components of an council complaints, organization; or a region. One individual must be designated as PI. Investigators may be working in closely related areas or their research may be multidisciplinary. An equipment proposal must contain all of the following proposal sections: Project Summary: GPG Chapter II.C.2.b should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. Project Description (not to exceed 15 pages) that includes: a. an overall acquisition plan which discusses arrangements for acquisition, maintenance and operation. Equipment to be purchased, modified or constructed must be described in sufficient detail to allow comparison of its capabilities with the needs of the proposed activities; b. a description, from each potential major user, of the project(s) for which the equipment will be used.

This description must be succinct, not necessarily as detailed as in a full research proposal, and must emphasize the christian intrinsic merit of the complaints activity and essay council complaints, the importance of the essay complaints equipment to it. A brief summary will suffice for auxiliary users; and. c. Scholarships! a description of comparable equipment already at the proposing organization(s), if applicable, and an explanation of council why it cannot be used. Essay Love Than Death! This includes comparable government-owned equipment that is on-site. Biographical Sketch(es) of the essay council complaints person(s) who will have overall responsibility for maintenance and operation and a brief statement of qualifications (GPG Chapter II.C.2.f should be consulted to prepare this portion of the love than death proposal; also see GPG II.C.2.f(iii)). Proposal Budget and Budget Justification: An annual budget and council, budget justification for the operation, maintenance and administration of the proposed equipment, (GPG Chapter II.C.2.g should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal).

Current and Pending Support: GPG Chapter II.C.2.h should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources that includes a description of the physical facility, including floor plans or other appropriate information, where the equipment will be located; a narrative description of the source of funds available for operation and maintenance of the proposed equipment; a brief description of nest in the wind other support services available, and a statement of why the equipment is severable or non-severable from the physical facility (GPG Chapter II.C.2.i should be consulted to essay council prepare this portion of the nest wind proposal). Data Management Plan: GPG Chapter II.C.2.j should be consulted to prepare this portion of the essay complaints proposal. Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan (if applicable): GPG Chapter II.C.2.j should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. These proposals normally compete with proposals for research or education projects. 31. 7. Proposals Involving Vertebrate Animals. a. Any project proposing use of vertebrate animals for research or education shall comply with the Animal Welfare Act [7 U.S.C.

2131, et seq.] and the regulations promulgated thereunder by the Secretary of Agriculture [9 CFR 1.1-4.11] pertaining to the humane care, handling, and treatment of vertebrate animals held or used for council, research, teaching or other activities supported by council Federal awards. In accordance with these requirements, proposed projects involving use of any vertebrate animal for essay council complaints, research or education must be approved by the submitting organization's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) before an essay complaints, award can be made. For this approval to be accepted by NSF, the organization must have a current Public Health Service (PHS) Approved Assurance. In the case of research involving the study of wildlife in essay council complaints the field or in essay the laboratory, for the provision in the PHS Assurance for Institutional Commitment (Section II) that requires the in the organization to establish and maintain a program for activities involving animals in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Guide), the organization has established and will maintain a program for activities involving animals according to the Guide. The organization will follow recommendations specified in the Guide for details involving laboratory animals, and taxon-specific guidelines approved by the American Society of Ichthyologists and council complaints, Herpetologists, the American Society of Mammalogists, and the Ornithological Council, as is appropriate for format a term paper, the taxon to be studied. 32. b. Sufficient information must be provided within the council 15-page Project Description to enable reviewers to evaluate the: (i) rationale for involving animals; (ii) choice of species and essay, number of animals to be used; (iii) description of the essay council proposed use of the animals; (iv) exposure of animals to discomfort, pain, or injury; and. (v) description of any euthanasia methods to be used. c. Research facilities subject to the Animal Welfare Act using or intending to use live animals in research and who receive Federal funding are required to register the facility with the for writing paper Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), US Department of Agriculture.

A current listing of licensed animal dealers also may be obtained from essay APHIS. The location of the essay nearest APHIS Regional Office, as well as information concerning this and other APHIS activities, may be obtained at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/. d. Projects involving the care or use of vertebrate animals at a foreign organization or foreign field site also require approval of research protocols by the US grantee’s IACUC. Council! If the project is to be funded through an essay love stronger than death, award to a foreign organization or through an individual fellowship award that will support activities at a foreign organization, NSF will require a statement explicitly listing the proposer’s name and referencing the title of the award to confirm that the activities will be conducted in accordance with all applicable laws in the foreign country and that the International Guiding Principles for complaints, Biomedical Research Involving Animals (see http://www.cioms.ch/) will be followed. e. The following information regarding the organization’s intention to nest utilize vertebrate animals as part of the essay council project should be provided on the Cover Sheet: (i) The box for Vertebrate Animals must be checked on the Cover Sheet if use of in the wind vertebrate animals is council complaints, envisioned. (ii) The date of IACUC approval of the format for writing animal-use protocol covering the council proposed work (if obtained) must be identified in the space provided.

(iii) The PHS Approved Animal Welfare Assurance Number must be entered in essay love than death the space provided. If IACUC approval has not been obtained prior to submission, the council complaints proposer should indicate Pending in the space provided for nest in the wind, the approval date. If a decision is made to fund the proposal, the organization must provide a signed copy of the official IACUC approval letter to essay the cognizant NSF Program Officer before an award can be issued. The approval letter must affirm that an animal-use protocol covering the proposed activities has been approved, and should explicitly list the proposer’s name, the title and number of the NSF proposal, and the date of IACUC approval. f. For fellowship proposals submitted by individuals that involve use of vertebrate animals, a copy of the approval letter from the IACUC (including Assurance Number and organizational signature) should be included in the Supplementary Documentation section of the proposal or sent directly to the cognizant NSF Program Officer. The letter should indicate approval of the proposed activities. If IACUC approval has not been obtained prior to submission, the proposer should indicate Pending in christian scholarships the space provided for the approval date. If a decision is made to essay council complaints fund the proposal, the organization must provide a signed copy of the official IACUC approval letter to the cognizant program. Christian! The letter should indicate approval of the proposed activities, explicitly listing the proposer’s name and referencing the title of the essay NSF proposal, and must be submitted prior to an award being issued. See also AAG Chapter VI.B.3 for additional information on the administration of argument essay awards that utilize vertebrate animals.

Note that for some types of vertebrate animals (e.g., non-human primates), additional review may be required. 8. Proposals Involving Human Subjects. a. Projects involving research with human subjects must ensure that subjects are protected from research risks in conformance with the relevant federal policy known as the Common Rule ( Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects , 45 CFR 690). All projects involving human subjects must either (1) have approval from the organization's Institutional Review Board (IRB) before issuance of an NSF award or, (2) must affirm that the IRB has declared the research exempt from IRB review, in accordance with the applicable subsection, as established in section 101(b) of the Common Rule. If certification of exemption is essay, provided after submission of the proposal and before the award is issued, the exemption number corresponding to one or more of the exemption categories also must be included in the documentation provided to NSF. The only christian scholarships acceptable IRB approval documents are those that approve a human subjects research protocol; approvals in concept are not acceptable. NSF also cannot accept any IRB document that qualifies conditions that must be met before human subjects work can be carried out. If IRB approval cannot be obtained at the time of the award action because the development of a human subjects research protocol requires preliminary or other conceptual work to take place, the PI should notify the cognizant NSF Program Officer assigned to the proposal. In such a case, NSF may add conditions to the award that prevent any research involving human subjects from being carried out, and otherwise restrict the essay council complaints drawing down of essay council funds, until IRB approval has been obtained.

If the project involves human subjects and is to be performed outside of the council complaints US, evidence of IRB approval also is required. If there is no IRB approval provided, and the foreign country is not included in essay council the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP), International Compilation of complaints Human Research Standards (http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/international/intlcompilation/intlcompilation.html), nor is an Assurance on file with OHRP (http://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx?styp=bsc), NSF may decline to support the project. b. The following information regarding the organization’s intention to use human subjects as part of the nest in the wind essay project should be provided on the Cover Sheet: (i) The box for Human Subjects must be checked on the Cover Sheet if use of essay complaints human subjects is envisioned. (ii) If human subject activities are exempt from IRB review, provide the exemption number(s) corresponding to one or more of the exemption categories. Complaints! The six categories of research that qualify for exemption from coverage by the regulations are defined in the Common Rule for Protection of Human Subjects. (iii) If the research is not designated as exempt, the IRB approval date should be identified in the space provided. This date, at complaints, minimum, should cover the period at which the project is initiated. If IRB approval has not been obtained prior to submission, the proposer should indicate Pending in the space provided for the approval date. If a decision is made to fund the proposal, the essay complaints organization must provide a signed copy of the IRB approval letter to the cognizant program.

The letter should indicate approval of the proposed activities and essay complaints, must be submitted prior to an award being issued. (iv) The Federal Wide Assurance (FWA) Number that the proposer has on file with OHRP should be entered, if available. See also AAG Chapter VI.B.1 for additional information on the administration of argument on smoking awards that use human subjects. 9. Conference Proposals 33. NSF supports conferences in special areas of science and engineering that bring experts together to discuss recent research or education findings or to expose other researchers or students to new research and education techniques. NSF encourages the convening in the US of major international conferences. Conferences will be supported only if equivalent results cannot be obtained at regular meetings of professional societies. Although requests for council, support of conferences ordinarily originate with educational institutions or scientific and engineering societies, they also may come from other groups.

Shared support by several Federal agencies, States or private organizations is encouraged. Because proceedings of such conferences normally should be published in professional journals, requests for support may include publication costs. Christian Scholarships! Proposals for conferences should generally be submitted at least a year in advance of the scheduled date. Conferences, including the facilities in essay council which they are held, funded in papers never whole or in part with NSF funds, must be accessible to participants with disabilities. NSF funds are not to be spent for meals and council, coffee breaks for intramural meetings of an organization or any of christian its components, including, but not limited to, laboratories, departments and centers, as a direct cost. A conference proposal must contain the elements identified below: Project Summary (GPG Chapter II.C.2.b should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal) Project Description (not to essay complaints exceed 15 pages) that includes: a. A statement of the need for such a gathering and a list of topics; b. A listing of recent meetings on the same subject, including dates and locations; c. In The Essay! The names of the chairperson and members of organizing committees and their organizational affiliations; d. Council! Information on the location and probable date(s) of the format meeting and the method of announcement or invitation; e. A statement of how the complaints meeting will be organized and conducted, how the christian scholarships results of the meeting will be disseminated and how the meeting will contribute to the enhancement and improvement of scientific, engineering and/or educational activities; Proposal Budget and Budget Justification: A budget, and budget justification for the conference that is prepared in accordance with GPG Chapter II.C.2.g.

The following provides a listing of the types of costs that may be included on a conference budget. Such costs may be included only if they are specifically and clearly identified in essay council the proposed scope of work and love stronger than death, budget. Note that registration fees under NSF-supported conferences are considered program income. For additional information on essay complaints program income associated with conferences, see AAG Chapter III.D.4. a. Conference Facilities. Rental of facilities and never, necessary equipment. b. Supplies. Council! Expendable materials and supplies necessary for the meeting.

c. Conference Services. Costs of translation services, audio visual, webcast, and computer services for recording, transmitting and transcribing the proceedings. d. Essay Council! Publication Costs. Council! Costs of publishing the proceedings. e. Salaries. Salaries of professional personnel, editorial and clerical assistants and other staff members in proportion to christian scholarships the time or effort devoted to the preparation and conduct of the conference and summarizing its results. f. Consultant Services and Speaker Fees. Reasonable fees and essay, travel allowances and per papers, diem (or meals provided in lieu of per diem). Essay Council! Consultants’ travel costs, including subsistence, may be included. If requested, the proposer must be able to justify that the format proposed rate of essay complaints pay is reasonable. Additional information on the allowability of consultant or professional service costs is available in 2 CFR § 200.459.

In addition to term resold other provisions required by the proposing organization, all contracts made under the NSF award must contain the applicable provisions identified in 2 CFR § 200 Appendix II. g. Meals and Coffee Breaks. Meals that are an integral and necessary part of a conference (e.g., working meals where business is transacted). Funds may be included for furnishing a reasonable amount of essay hot beverages or soft drinks to conference participants and attendees during periodic coffee breaks. The following provides a listing of the types of argument essay costs that are not allowable for essay council complaints, inclusion on a conference budget. a. Christian Scholarships! Meals and council, Coffee Breaks for Intramural Meetings. NSF funds may not be included or spent for meals or coffee breaks for intramural meetings of an organization or any of its components, including, but not limited to, laboratories, departments and centers, as a direct cost. b. Entertainment. Costs of entertainment, amusement, diversion and social activities (such as tickets to shows or sporting events, meals, lodging, rentals, transportation and gratuities) are unallowable and may not be requested. Travel, meal, and hotel expenses of nest wind essay awardee employees who are not on travel status also are not permitted. Costs of employees on essay complaints travel status are limited to those specifically authorized by 2 CFR § 200.474.

c. Alcoholic Beverages. NSF funds may not be proposed for alcoholic beverages. Current and Pending Support: The support requested or available from other Federal agencies and other sources. GPG Chapter II.C.2.h should be consulted to prepare this portion of the essay proposal. If included, these resources will not be auditable and must not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. A description of such support should be included in essay complaints the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal. (See GPG Chapter II.C.2.g.(xi) for council, further information.)

Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources: If there will be support from other sources for the conference, such information should be included in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal. The description should be narrative in nature and must not include any quantifiable financial information. GPG Chapter II.C.2.i should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. Data Management Plan: Plans for complaints, management and sharing of any data products resulting from the activity. Love Stronger Death! GPG Chapter II.C.2.j should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. 10.

International Travel Proposals. Proposals for travel support for US participation in international scientific and engineering meetings held abroad are handled by the NSF organizational unit with program responsibility for the area of interest. Group travel awards are encouraged as the essay council primary means of essay support for international travel. A university, professional society or other non-profit organization may apply for funds to complaints enable it to coordinate and support US participation in one or more international scientific meeting(s) abroad. Proposals submitted for this purpose should address the same items as those indicated for conferences (see Section 9 above), with particular attention to plans for composition and recruitment of the travel group. Information on planned speakers should be provided where available from the christian conference organizer. Similar to proposals for conferences, symposia, or workshops, if any section is not required, insert text or upload a document in that section of the proposal that states, Not Applicable. Group travel proposals may request support only for the international travel costs of the proposed activity. Essay! Group travel grantees are required to retain supporting documentation that funds were spent in essay council complaints accordance with the original intent of the essay complaints proposal.

Such documentation may be required in final reports and is subject to essay council audit. 11. Support for Development of NSF Centers. NSF provides support for essay council, a variety of individual Centers and Centers programs that contribute to the Foundation's vision as outlined in the NSF Strategic Plan. Centers exploit opportunities in science, engineering and essay council complaints, technology in which the council complaints complexity of the research problem(s) or the than resources needed to solve the(se) problem(s) require the advantages of scope, scale, change, duration, equipment, facilities, and students that can only be provided by essay complaints an academic research center. They focus on investigations at the frontiers of for writing a term paper knowledge not normally attainable through individual investigations, at complaints, the interfaces of disciplines and/or by incorporating fresh approaches to the core of wind essay disciplines. Centers focus on integrative learning and discovery and essay council, demonstrate leadership in broadening participation through focused investments in a diverse set of partner organizations and individuals. In doing so, they draw upon, and contribute to, the development of the Nation's full intellectual talent. Most Center awards are limited to a maximum duration of ten years and are often subject to mid-course external merit review.

Proposers interested in learning more about current or future NSF Centers are encouraged to contact the appropriate disciplinary NSF Program Officer. 12. Papers! Support for essay complaints, Development of Major Research Equipment and Facilities. As an integral part of its responsibility for strengthening the science and engineering infrastructure of the country, NSF provides support for essay love death, the construction and operation of major research equipment and facilities. NSF depends on the research communities to essay council provide the justification, planning, development, and death, implementation of facility projects.

This normally occurs through National Academies studies, workshop reports, professional society activities, and other community-based mechanisms, including engineering studies and research projects related to the development of new technologies. Many of these mechanisms are funded by interested NSF Programs on the basis of merit-reviewed proposals. The construction funding mechanism depends on the scale of the proposed facility. For large facilities construction, the Major Research Equipment and essay council complaints, Facilities Construction (MREFC) account is one option. Proposers are strongly encouraged to contact the appropriate NSF Program to discuss the availability of funding and the appropriate funding mechanisms in advance of argument essay proposal submission. 13.

Projects Requiring High-Performance Computing Resources, Large Amounts of Data Storage, or Advanced Visualization Resources. Many research projects require access to computational, data storage or visualization resources in order to complete the work proposed. Complaints! For those projects that require such resources at a scale that is beyond that typically available locally, NSF supports a number of resources. For the most computationally intensive projects, the wind essay Blue Waters system at council complaints, University of Illinois, Urbana/Champaign, is the most suitable. Blue Waters is essay, designed to support a small number ( 50) of research teams involved with projects requiring the most advanced computational and data resources. Currently, the allocation process for council, that resource is done directly via proposal submission to the cognizant Program Officer in paper the Division of Advanced CyberInfrastructure within the NSF Directorate for Computer Information Science Engineering.

Proposals are reviewed for both their scientific and council, computational needs. The Blue Waters supercomputer provides sustained performance of 1 petaflop on a range of real-world science and engineering applications. It is one of the most powerful supercomputers in the world. Those interested should visit the Blue Waters portal (https://bluewaters.ncsa.illinois.edu/) for more details of the system's hardware and capabilities. Yellowstone, which is part of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, is a significant resource, 1.5 petaflop peak speed, but one that is designed to meet the needs of the atmospheric and related-sciences communities. Yellowstone operates its own allocations process and those interested in obtaining time and/or storage should consult the cognizant program director in the Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences within the Geosciences Directorate. The most general set of computational and data resources funded by the NSF are accessible through the stronger than death XSEDE project. XSEDE provides the integrating fabric for a collection of very powerful supercomputers, a high-throughput computing environment, high-volume data storage facilities, advanced visualization services, connected by essay council complaints a high-bandwidth private network, a training education and nest wind essay, outreach program in how to use its services and an extended collaborative support program to assist researchers in using the council advanced computational resources. The physical resources themselves are provided by Service Providers (SP) via separate awards from the NSF. Allocations of those resources for large projects are determined by in the wind the XSEDE Resource Advisory Committee, which meets quarterly, using an external set of experts.

Smaller requests do not require a proposal or review and essay complaints, a simple on-line process may be used to papers request such an allocation. NSF encourages prospective users to seek more information at https://www.xsede.org, where they can also register for a portal account. 14. Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC) This section applies to all research, for which NSF grant funds may be used, that potentially falls within the scope of the US Government Policy for council complaints, Institutional Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern as published in September, 2014, hereafter referred to as the scholarships Policy. NSF is committed to preserving the essay complaints benefits of life sciences research while minimizing the risk of misuse of the knowledge, information, products, or technologies provided by such research. The purpose of NSF’s implementation of the Policy is to clarify proposer expectations about christian scholarships NSF-funded research with certain high-consequence pathogens and toxins with potential to council be considered dual use research of concern.

Proposing organizations are responsible for identifying NSF-funded life sciences proposals that could potentially be considered dual use research of papers resold concern as defined in the US Government Policy for Institutional Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern and for compliance with the requirements established in that Policy. (See also AAG Chapter VI.B.5 for additional information.) Exhibit II-1: Proposal Preparation Checklist. It is imperative that all proposals conform to the proposal preparation and submission instructions specified in the Grant Proposal Guide . Conformance with all preparation and submission instructions is council, required and will be strictly enforced unless a deviation has been approved in advance of proposal submission. Note that some NSF program solicitations modify the general provisions of the GPG, and in such cases, the guidelines provided in the solicitation must be followed. FastLane uses the rules specified for christian, each type of proposal, (e.g., RAPID, EAGER, Ideas Lab, Equipment, Conference, and essay complaints, International Travel) to check for compliance prior to submission to NSF. Proposers are strongly advised to nest essay review the applicable sections of the council complaints GPG pertinent to the type of essay stronger than death proposal being developed PRIOR to essay submission. NSF will not accept 34 or will return without review proposals that are not consistent with these instructions.

See GPG Chapter IV.B for additional information. Prior to never resold submission, it is strongly recommended that an administrative review be conducted to ensure that proposals comply with the essay council instructions, in the format specified. This checklist is not intended to be an all-inclusive repetition of the required proposal contents and council, associated proposal preparation guidelines. It is, however, meant to highlight certain critical items so they will not be overlooked when the proposal is prepared. [ ] The proposal is council complaints, responsive to and compliant with the provisions in the program description, announcement, or solicitation. [ ] If the essay than proposal has been previously declined and is being resubmitted, the proposal has been revised to take into account the major comments from the prior NSF review. [ ] The proposed work is appropriate for funding by NSF, and is not a duplicate of, or substantially similar to, a proposal already under consideration by NSF from the same submitter. [ ] The proposal will be submitted by 5 p.m. submitter's local time on the established deadline date.

[ ] Single Copy Documents: [ ] Authorization to Deviate from NSF Proposal Preparation Requirements (if applicable). [ ] List of essay complaints Suggested Reviewers, or Reviewers Not To Include has been provided (if applicable). [ ] Collaborators and other Affiliation information has been provided for each individual identified as senior project personnel. [ ] For interdisciplinary proposals, ensure all relevant programs are identified. [ ] For renewal proposals, previous award numbers have been entered. [ ] Related preliminary proposal number has been entered (if applicable). [ ] Appropriate box(es) have been checked, and requisite information has been provided. [ ] The Project Summary may ONLY be uploaded as a Supplementary Document if use of special characters is necessary. Such Project Summaries must be formatted with separate headings for Overview, Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts.

[ ] Project Description does not exceed the format a term paper page limitations specified in the GPG or solicitation. [ ] Project Description contains, as a separate section within the narrative, a section labeled Broader Impacts. [ ] Results from Prior NSF Support have been provided for PIs and co-PIs who have received NSF support within the last five years. Results related to essay council Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts are described under two separate, distinct headings. [ ] This section includes bibliographic citations only and does not provide parenthetical information outside of the argument essay on smoking 15-page Project Description. [ ] Each reference is in essay council the specified format.

[ ] The content described is in accordance with the instructions, and does not contain additional information beyond that specified. [ ] Each budget line item is documented and justified in the budget justification. [ ] Unless required by an NSF program solicitation, voluntary committed cost sharing has not been included. Note that voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited and Line M on the proposal budget will not be available for use by the proposer. While not required by NSF, proposing organizations may, at never resold, their own discretion, continue to contribute voluntary uncommitted cost sharing to NSF-sponsored projects. These resources are not auditable by NSF and should not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. [ ] Current and Pending Support : [ ] All current and pending support from whatever source (e.g., Federal, State, local or foreign government agencies, public or private foundations, industrial or other commercial organizations, or internal funds allocated toward specific projects) must be listed. The proposed project and all other projects or activities requiring a portion of time of the PI and other senior personnel must be included, even if they receive no salary support from the project(s).

[ ] Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources: [ ] An aggregated description of the internal and external resources (both physical and personnel) that the essay complaints organization and its collaborators will provide to the project, should it be funded, has been included. [ ] No quantifiable financial information has been provided. [ ] If there are no facilities, equipment or other resources identified, a statement to that effect has been included in this section of the proposal and uploaded into FastLane. [ ] Special Information and Supplementary Documentation: [ ] The types of information identified in GPG Chapter II.C.2.j have been included, as appropriate. [ ] Any additional items specified in a relevant program solicitation have been included. Exhibit II-2: Potentially Disqualifying Conflicts of Interest. Unless a waiver has been granted by papers resold NSF, a reviewer cannot review a proposal if: the reviewer, the reviewer’s spouse, minor child, or business partner; the organization where the complaints reviewer is employed, has an arrangement for future employment or is essay on smoking, negotiating for employment; or. the organization where the reviewer is an officer, director, trustee, or partner, has a financial interest in the outcome of the proposal. Unless a waiver has been granted by essay council complaints NSF, a potential reviewer also may be barred from essay love reviewing a proposal, if it involves individuals with whom he/she has a personal relationship, such as a close relative, current or former collaborator, or former thesis student/advisor. Unless a waiver has been granted by NSF, a disqualifying conflict may exist, if a proposal involves an organization or other entity with which the council potential reviewer has a connection. Such potentially disqualifying connections include: a reviewer’s recent former employer; an organization in which the reviewer is an active participant; an institution at which the reviewer is argument essay, currently enrolled as a student, or at which he/she serves as a visiting committee member; or.

an entity with which the reviewer has or seeks some other business or financial relationship (including receipt of an honorarium.) Exhibit II-3: Drug-Free Workplace Certification. Instructions for Certification. By signing the NSF Cover Sheet and submitting this proposal, the Authorized Organizational Representative is providing the certifications set out below. The certification set out below is a material representation of council complaints fact upon which reliance was placed when the agency determined to award the grant. If it is later determined that the grantee knowingly rendered a false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements of the council complaints Drug-Free Workplace Act, the agency, in addition to essay any other remedies available to the Federal Government, may take action authorized under the Drug-Free Workplace Act. For grantees other than individuals, Alternate I applies. For grantees who are individuals, Alternate II applies. Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace Requirements. Alternate I (Grantees Other Than Individuals)

The grantee certifies that it will or will continue to nest essay provide a drug-free workplace by: (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in council the grantee’s workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of argument on smoking such prohibition; (b) Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to council inform employees about -- (1) The dangers of council complaints drug abuse in the workplace; (2) The grantee’s policy of essay maintaining a drug-free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs; and. (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by for writing a term paragraph (a); (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will -- (1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and. (2) Notify the employer in council writing of his or her conviction for essay stronger death, a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in council the workplace, no later than five calendar days after such conviction; (e) Notifying the agency in writing, within 10 calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an term never, employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on essay council complaints whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the essay love stronger death Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the complaints identification number(s) of each affected grant; (f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of scholarships receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted-- (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the essay council complaints Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or. (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; (g) Making a good faith effort to scholarships continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f). Alternate II (Grantees Who Are Individuals) (a) The grantee certifies that, as a condition of the complaints grant, he or she will not engage in scholarships the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance in conducting any activity with the complaints grant. (b) If convicted of scholarships a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity, he or she will report the conviction, in writing, within 10 calendar days of the conviction, to every grant officer or other designee, unless the Federal agency designates a central point for the receipt of council complaints such notices. Essay Council Complaints! When notice is made to such a central point, it shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant. For NSF, grantee notification should be made to council the Cost Analysis Audit Resolution Branch, Division of essay Institution Award Support, NSF, Arlington, VA 22230. Exhibit II-4: Debarment and Suspension Certification.

Instruction on Certification Regarding Debarment and Suspension. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary participant is providing the certification set out below. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. Essay Council! The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the on smoking department or agency's determination whether to complaints enter into this transaction. Essay Complaints! However, failure of the essay council prospective primary participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction.

The certification in this clause is any material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into essay this transaction. If it is essay, later determined that the scholarships prospective primary participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to complaints other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. The prospective primary participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to whom this proposal is never, submitted if at any time the prospective primary participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. The terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant, person, primary covered transaction, principal, proposal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in council the Definitions and Coverage sections of the rules implementing Executive Order 12549. Essay Council! You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. The prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into essay council complaints any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is christian, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by complaints the department or agency entering into this transaction. The prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and papers never resold, Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transaction, provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions.

A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to, check the Nonprocurement List. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to essay complaints require establishment of a system of in the essay records in order to render in good faith the certification required by council complaints this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by complaints a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into essay council complaints a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. (1) The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from a covered transaction by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of argument on smoking records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for essay, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in term paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall include an explanation with this proposal. Exhibit II-5: Lobbying Certification. Instructions on Certification Regarding Lobbying.

This certification is council, required for format for writing, an award of a Federal contract, grant or cooperative agreement exceeding $100,000 and for council complaints, an award of on smoking a Federal loan or a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan exceeding $150,000. The Certification for essay council complaints, Contracts, Grants, Loans and Cooperative Agreements also is included in full text on the FastLane submission screen. Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans and Cooperative Agreements. The undersigned certifies, to term never resold the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an essay council, officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of never resold a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to essay influence an papers resold, officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an essay council, employee of a Member of Congress in wind essay connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the council complaints undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form LLL, “Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,” in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the love death language of this certification be included in complaints the award documents for argument essay, all subawards at all tiers including subcontracts, subgrants, and council, contracts under grants, loans, and on smoking, cooperative agreements and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, US Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to complaints a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for format, each such failure. Exhibit II-6: Nondiscrimination Certification. Instructions for Nondiscrimination Certification. In accordance with NSF policy, by signing the proposal, the Authorized Organizational Representative is essay council, providing the requisite Certification of Compliance with National Science Foundation Nondiscrimination Regulations and Policies. This Certification sets forth the nondiscrimination obligations with which all awardees must comply. These obligations also apply to subrecipients, subgrantees, and subcontractors under the award.

The proposer therefore, shall obtain the NSF Nondiscrimination Certification from each organization that applies to christian be, or serves as a subrecipient, subgrantee or subcontractor under the award (for other than the provision of commercially available supplies, materials, equipment or general support services) prior to entering into the subaward arrangement. The proposer shall provide immediate notice to the Foundation if at any time the proposer learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted, or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. Certification of Compliance with National Science Foundation Nondiscrimination Regulations and Policies. By signing the proposal, the Authorized Organizational Representative hereby certifies that the essay complaints organization will comply with Title VI of the term papers resold Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC § 2000d), Title IX of the essay complaints Education Amendments of 1972 (20 USC §§ 1681 et seq.), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC § 794), the Age Discrimination Act of essay 1975 (42 USC §§ 6101 et seq.) and essay council, all regulations and papers resold, policies issued by NSF pursuant to these statutes. To that end, in accordance with the above-referenced nondiscrimination statutes, and NSF’s implementing regulations and policies, no person in the United States shall, on essay council complaints the ground of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, or age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the essay benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the Proposer receives Federal financial assistance from the Foundation; and HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT it will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial assistance extended to the Proposer by the Foundation, this Certification shall obligate the Proposer, or in the case of any transfer of such property, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits.

If any personal property is so provided, this Certification shall obligate the Proposer for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property. In all other cases, this Certification shall obligate the Proposer for complaints, the period during which the for writing paper Federal financial assistance is complaints, extended to it by essay council complaints the Foundation. THIS CERTIFICATION is essay, given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, cooperative agreements, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to argument essay on smoking the Proposer by the Foundation, including installment payments after such date on account of complaints applications for Federal financial assistance which were approved before such date. Essay! The Proposer recognizes and agrees that such Federal financial assistance will be extended in reliance on the representations and agreements made in this Certification, and that the United States shall have the right to essay complaints seek judicial enforcement of this Certification. This Certification is binding on the Proposer, its successors, transferees, and assignees. Exhibit II-7: Definitions of Categories of Personnel. The personnel categories listed on parts A and B of the Proposal Budget are defined as follows:

A. Senior Personnel. 1. (co) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR (PI/PD) means the individual(s) designated by the proposer, and approved by NSF, who will be responsible for the scientific or technical direction of the project. NSF does not infer any distinction in scientific stature among multiple PIs, whether referred to as PI or co-PI. If more than one, the papers never resold first one listed will serve as the contact PI, with whom all communications between NSF program officials and the project relating to the scientific, technical, and budgetary aspects of the project should take place. The PI and any identified co-PIs, however, will be jointly responsible for submission of the requisite project reports. The term Principal Investigator generally is used in essay council research projects, while the term Project Director generally is argument essay on smoking, used in centers, large facilities, and other projects. For purposes of council complaints this Guide, PI/co-PI is interchangeable with PD/co-PD. 2. Faculty Associate (faculty member) -- an individual other than the Principal Investigator(s) considered by essay council complaints the performing institution to be a member of its faculty or who holds an essay, appointment as a faculty member at another institution, and who will participate in the project being supported. B. Other Personnel. 1. Postdoctoral (Scholar, Fellow, or Other Postdoctoral Position) -- An individual who has received a doctoral degree (or equivalent) and is engaged in a temporary and defined period of mentored advanced training to in the essay enhance the professional skills and research independence needed to pursue his or her chosen career path. Complaints! Postdoctoral scholars not identified under Senior Personnel above should be listed as Other Personnel.

2. Love Death! Other Professional -- a person who may or may not hold a doctoral degree or its equivalent, who is considered a professional and is not reported as a Principal Investigator, faculty associate, postdoctoral scholar or student. Essay Council Complaints! Examples of persons included in this category are doctoral associates not reported under B1, professional technicians, physicians, veterinarians, system experts, computer programmers and design engineers. 3. Graduate Student (research assistant) -- a part-time or full-time student working on essay complaints the project in a research capacity who holds at least a bachelor’s degree and is enrolled in a degree program leading to an advanced degree. 4. Undergraduate Student -- a student who is essay council, enrolled in a degree program (part-time or full-time) leading to a bachelor’s or associate’s degree. 5. 6. These categories include persons working on the project in a non-research capacity, such as secretaries, clerk-typists, draftsmen, animal caretakers, electricians and custodial personnel regardless of essay on smoking whether they hold a degree or are involved in degree work.

Any personnel category for which NSF funds are requested must indicate, in the parentheses provided on the Proposal Budget, the number of persons expected to receive some support from those funds. 9 Macintosh users also may use Helvetica and Palatino typefaces.Back to complaints Text. 10 Further instructions for this process are available in FastLane. Back to term papers never resold Text. 11 Detailed instructions for essay council, completion of this process are available in FastLane. Back to Text. 12 Detailed instructions submission of the SF LLL are available in FastLane. Back to Text. 13 A wide array of scholarships information exists to help inform development of an institution’s RCR training plan.

For example, many professional societies as well as governmental licensing authorities for professional scientists and council complaints, engineers have adopted policies or best practices that might be usefully considered. In addition, research is illuminating existing practices surrounding ethical issues, and nest wind, providing an evaluation of pedagogical innovations in ethics education. NSF has funded two beta sites (NSF Award 0936857 and NSF Award 0936865) to begin to provide an interactive community online resource on essay ethics education in science and love stronger death, engineering. Back to Text. 14 Proposal Not Accepted is defined as FastLane will not permit submission of the proposal. Back to Text. 15 If the proposal includes use of vertebrate animals, supplemental information is essay council, required. See for additional information.Back to Text. 16 If the proposal includes GPG Chapter II.D.7 use of human subjects, supplemental information is required. See GPG Chapter II.D.8 for additional information. Back to stronger death Text.

17 Previously referred to as the effective date. Back to Text. 18 NSF awardees remain subject to the provisions of council OMB M-01-06, Clarification of OMB A-21 Treatment of Voluntary Uncommitted Cost Sharing and Tuition Remission Costs , regarding requirements for committing and tracking some level of faculty (or senior researcher) effort as part of the organized research base.Back to death Text. 19 Detailed instructions for submission of essay council complaints confidential budgetary information are available in FastLane. Back to Text. 20 According to argument the IRS, US territories and possessions are as follows: Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the essay Northern Mariana Islands, Midway Island, Wake Island, Palmyra Island, Howland Island, Johnston Island, Baker Island, Kingman Reef, Jarvis Island, and other US islands, cays, and reefs that are not part of a term paper any of the fifty states. See also: http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/International-Taxpayers/Persons-Employed-In-U.S.-Possessions.Back to Text. 21 See AAG Chapter VI.F and Grant General Conditions (GC-1) Article 10 for additional information on travel restrictions.Back to essay council complaints Text. 22 A subaward may be provided through any form of legal agreement, including an agreement that the proposing organization considers a contract.

The substance of the relationship is more important than the form of the agreement.Back to Text. 23 See NSF’s Revised Cost Sharing Policy Statement for the Foundation’s overarching policies on cost sharing. Back to Text. 24 For further information on procedures for inclusion of programmatic cost sharing in an NSF solicitation, see http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/csdocs/principles.pdf. Back to Text.

25 2 CFR § 200.306 describes criteria and procedures for the allowability of essay than death cash and in-kind contributions in satisfying cost sharing and matching requirements. Back to Text. 26 For purposes of meeting the mentoring requirement, simultaneously submitted collaborative proposals, and collaborative proposals that include subawards, constitute a single unified project. Therefore, only one mentoring plan may be submitted for essay council, the entire project. Nest Wind Essay! Back to Text.

27 In situations where a postdoctoral researcher is listed in Section A of the NSF Budget, and essay council complaints, is functioning in a Senior Personnel capacity (i.e., responsible for the scientific or technical direction of the essay on smoking project), a mentoring plan is not required. Back to Text. 28 Ideas Labs are generally one to five days in duration. Council Complaints! Back to Text. 29 Detailed instructions for council, the preparation and submission of collaborative proposals are available in FastLane. Back to Text. 30 5 p.m., submitter’s local timeBack to Text.

31 See AAG Chapter IV.D for essay complaints, additional information on the administration of equipment awards. Back to Text. 33 This coverage also applies to symposia and workshop proposals. Back to Text. 34 Proposal Not Accepted is defined as FastLane will not permit submission of the proposal.

Back to Text.

Write My Essay Online for Cheap -
Essay council complaints

analysis theme essay You’ve been staring at essay complaints your blank computer screen for what feels like hours, trying to figure out how to start your analytical essay. You try to choose between writing the introduction first or getting right into the meat of it. But somehow, it seems too difficult to do either. What you need is is a blueprint—a foolproof way to get your essay structured. Then all you have to do is love stronger fill in the blanks. By Anonymous [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons. What an Analytical Essay Is—And What It Isn’t. Complaints! Helpful, right? Um, not so much. First, it might be more useful to explain what an analytical essay isn’t before getting to what it is . An analytical essay isn’t a summary. Though this may seem obvious in theory, it’s more difficult in christian, practice.

If you read your essay and it sounds a lot like a book report, it’s probably only summarizing events or characters. One way to essay council complaints, figure out if you’re summarizing instead of analyzing is to nest in the wind essay, look at your support. Are you simply stating what happened, or are you relating it back to your main point? Okay, so what is an analytical essay, exactly ? Usually, it’s writing that has a more narrowed focus than a summary. Analytical essays usually concentrate on how the essay complaints, book or poem was written—for example, how certain themes present themselves in the story, or how the use of metaphor brings a certain meaning to a poem. In short, this type of essay requires you to look at the smaller parts of the work to help shed light on the larger picture.

An example of a prompt—and the term papers, example I’m going to use for the rest of this post—could be something like: Analyze the theme of sacrifice in complaints, the Harry Potter series. (Note: there might be some spoilers, but I figured everyone who was planning on reading the books has done so already—or at least has seen the movies.) One Way To Form Your Analytical Essay Outline. There are quite a few ways to organize your analytical essay, but no matter how you choose to write it, your essay should always have three main parts: I’ll get into essay, the nitty-gritty of essay complaints, this soon, but for all you visual learners, here is a nice representation of all the components that make a great analytical essay outline. You can see that I’ve added a few more details than just the introduction, body, and conclusion. But hold your horses—we’re getting to those parts right now. Introduction of Your Analytical Essay Outline. Argument Essay On Smoking! The purpose of your introduction is to council, get the term papers resold, reader interested in your analysis. Complaints! The introduction should include at least three things—a hook, your thesis statement, and a sentence or two describing how you intend to christian, prove your thesis statement.

1. Council! You gotta hook ‘em from the start. The first part of your introduction should draw the nest in the essay, reader in. Essay! This is called the hook. The hook should be interesting or surprising. You can achieve this by asking a rhetorical question, giving some relevant statistics, or making a statement that’s unusual or controversial. For my Harry Potter example, I might say, “Since the publication of the first book in the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter and stronger than death the Philosopher’s Stone , some Christian groups have attacked the books for promoting witchcraft. However, one of the main themes of the books draws inspiration from Christianity itself—that of sacrifice.” Okay, so that’s two sentences.

But it’s got a little bit of essay council, controversy and relates to what the for writing, rest of the essay will discuss. 2. Essay Council Complaints! Get to the good stuff—write a killer thesis statement. Okay, so now that you’ve got your reader hooked, you need to start getting to the point. For Writing A Term Paper! This is where the thesis statement comes in. My thesis might be, “The theme of sacrifice is prevalent throughout the series and council complaints is embodied as sacrifice for the greater good, sacrifice for stronger than, an ultimate gain, and essay complaints sacrifice to keep a promise.” 3. It’s time to back up your thesis. Let the reader know how you’re going to prove your claim. For my example, I would let the reader know that I intend to term papers never, analyze the instances of council, Harry’s “death,” Voldemort’s sacrifice of format, his soul in exchange for immortality, and how Snape sacrifices in order to honor a promise made to essay council, Lily Potter.

These points will be the for writing a term, building blocks of the body paragraphs. Body of Your Analytical Essay Outline. The body is essay council where you can start to get really creative and play around with formatting. In the flowchart, there are three body paragraphs. But that’s because I was trained in the 5-paragraph outline. But you can include as many or as few body paragraphs as you want—as long as you end up thoroughly supporting your thesis. For my outline, each body paragraph includes a topic sentence, followed by three sets of essay council complaints, claims, evidence to support those claims, and how that evidence ties back to the topic sentence. Again, three is essay not necessarily a magic number here.

You could make one claim with a lot of evidence, or five claims to support your topic sentence. But let’s get into it, shall we? 1. Develop a strong topic sentence. Each topic sentence in each body paragraph of term papers resold, your analytical essay outline should tell the essay council, reader exactly what that section is going to be about. My first body paragraph might start with, “Harry Potter is essay willing to fulfill prophecy and make the ultimate sacrifice—that of his life—in order to save the rest of the wizarding world.” 2. Make your claim. The claim should dive into a smaller part of the overarching topic sentence. The topic sentence I gave can be broken down into several smaller claims—that Harry knew that he was fulfilling prophecy, that he was actually willing to die, and that his death would be of complaints, profound significance. 3. Provide evidence from the papers resold, text to council, back your claim.

You can’t just go around making claims without any support. You can use quotes or paraphrase parts of the text to add evidence. For evidence that Harry knew that he was fulfilling prophecy, you could cite the instance in the hall of prophecies with the quote, “and either must die at complaints the hand of the other for neither can live while the essay, other survives.” 4. Tie that evidence to complaints, the topic sentence. You have to make it absolutely clear why you included the evidence. Complaints! If you don’t, your analytical essay runs the risk of being a summary.

For example, with the citing of the prophecy, I would tell the reader that Harry and his friends found said prophecy and figured out that it had to be about him (although there are objections that it could’ve been referring to council complaints, Neville, but we’ll leave that out of this example). They knew that either Voldemort had to die or Harry did, and he had to be willing to do that. They’re not needed in the outline, but when you write your final essay, be sure you include effective transitions. This will help your essay flow. Conclusion of Your Analytical Essay Outline. After you’ve built up all of your body paragraphs, given the appropriate evidence to council complaints, back your claims, and tied that evidence to christian, your awesome topic sentences, you’re ready to wrap it all up. The conclusion should be a brief restatement of council, your main points without being a direct copy. For example, “There are many motivations behind sacrifice—to help others, to help oneself, or to keep a promise to a loved one—and J.K. Rowling explores several of stronger, them through the characters in the Harry Potter book series.” This, of course, does not suffice as a full conclusion.

To fill it out and give the reader a sense of closure, you can relate the theme to the real world or end with a final quote from the text or the author. Use This Downloadable Analytical Essay Outline as a Guide. Easy, right? I know you’re pumped to get started, but before you do, I have a template for the analytical essay outline for you to essay complaints, download. Of course, your instructor’s directions will trump mine, so if they say to in the essay, do something a specific way, I won’t be offended if you take their advice over mine.

And don’t forget about the Kibin editors. When your analytical essay is all typed up, they can help you make sure that it’s as good as it can get. Psst. 98% of Kibin users report better grades! Get inspiration from over 500,000 example essays. About the Author. Eden Meirow is a self-employed freelance writer with a passion for English, history and education. You can find her on Google+. dis was absooltelee fantasteec thxc you 4 de owwline. Essay Council! awesome! Glad you liked it. #128578; @naomi_tepper:disqus Oh my Gosh! this was amazing thank you so much!

This helped a lot with my Economics essay for papers never resold, Humanities 6 World Studies! Woot woot! Happy to council complaints, help. #128578; Thanks for the comment. This is christian scholarships undoubtedly very much helpful#8230; Thanks a lot. You#8217;re welcome! Thanks for the comment and essay thanks for reading. #128578; Hi#8230;.Eden thank you for orienting me on how to structure an analytical essay. because of many reasons which i don#8217;t like to name writing an analytical essay has been my Achilies Hill. Your effort in writing this article has thrown much need light as far as I#8217;m concerned.

I look forward to your reply on the question of structuring of analytical political essay on issues like say Affirmative Action or Constitutionalism. Thank you for your kind words. In regards to writing a political analytical essay, it varies depending on the course and the requirements of for writing paper, your instructor. However, you can follow the same advice in this post. Introduction with a hook and thesis, body paragraphs that make claims with evidence to support those claims, and a conclusion that wraps it all up. The main difference is council that you#8217;ll have to do more research than reading just one book. (And make sure to argument essay, cite your sources.) I hope that helped! Thank you, this will help ? This was really useful I went through so many websites the finally got this one. Sweet! Glad you found it helpful. hi this is essay council great.

Fabulous! Happy to help. How would I write an nest in the analytic essay using dramatic conventions? I#8217;m supposed to write an essay on The Tempest from Shakespeare using dramatic conventions and I#8217;m not doing so well at understanding how to do it. basically it#8217;s also asking me #8220;how dramatic conventions make the reader see characters in a certain way. Please respond to council, this if you can.

I think that I would devote one body paragraph to each of the on smoking, dramatic conventions that you#8217;re covering in your paper. For instance, in essay complaints, one paragraph, if you are writing about the term, conventions of essay, soliloquy, the play-within-a-play convention, and asides (these are the first three conventions I thought of #8212; I#8217;m not sure which ones you#8217;ve studied in class), then you could devote one body paragraph to each of these topics and their influence on how the argument, audience views the essay complaints, characters. I hope this puts you on the right track! I have two write an essay about essay stronger than, Animals by O#8217;Hara and how it reflects the innocence and simplicity of childhood. I don#8217;t know how to essay, start. For Writing! Could anyone suggest the first sentence of the introduction? I#8217;ve already got my outline #128578; Hi Lily Awesome that you have your outline ready to go. You might want to start with the quintessential quote from the text that stands out as reflecting these qualities of complaints, innocence/childhood simplicity. For more great hook sentence tips visit: https://www.kibin.com/essay-writing-blog/good-hook-sentences/ This is amazing and format a term extremely helpful! Thank you author. Hey, thanks for council complaints, reading and for the nice comment!

I#8217;ll be sure to show the never, author. #128578; do you eat pussy? Haha! Awesome. We#8217;re happy to essay council complaints, help, but don#8217;t sell yourself short just because of your blonde hair. Stronger! #128578; great site but second para 24th word should be ALWAYS not away. dont take this as offensive but im just trying to improve this site that is essay council complaints all. Thanks for keeping us on our toes, Shayan! No offense taken #8212; we#8217;ll get that updated #128578; Great blog post ! Just to for writing, add my thoughts if you are wanting a Express Evictions 3-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Quit , my secretary came across a blank version here https://goo.gl/nlOqzY. Hi there! Although this was really helpful for literary analysis, I was wondering if you had an idea as to how to essay, apply this to historical analysis. I have to write about the effects of European migration, warfare, and disease on Native Americans, and was thinking of finding 3 specific examples of each and explaining the effect that each had on Native Americans. Is this a good plan? You could *definitely* apply this framework to a historical analysis, yes!

As Eden mentions, you can have as many body paragraphs as you want, so you could devote a single paragraph to each of your examples #8212; giving you 9 body paragraphs. Papers Never Resold! Since that would get pretty lengthy, you could add a header before each of your 3-paragraph sections to keep your paper organized. DIOS MIO! this is really helpful. Woot! That#8217;s awesome. So happy you found this post helpful. #128578; Thanks for the kind comment. Complaints! This is so helpful, thank you. I have to write an analytical essay about argument on smoking, The Killer Angels by Michael Shaara and I#8217;m stuck. This is my second essay and on the first I received a C #128577; I don#8217;t know how to start and it isn#8217;t even about the essay complaints, whole book, its only for half the book. Please help.

Starting is definitely the hardest part sometimes :/ thanks so much for essay stronger than, your blog. you have made it very easy for me to essay council, understand this (horrible) essay. I have to write my first Analytical essay. kind regards to you. Than! And thanks to you for reading! Good luck with your essay #8212; you#8217;ve got this. I have to essay council complaints, write an analytical essay for term papers, my college English course, and its about an American folk song called #8220;Frankie and Johnny#8221; and im stuck in how to begin it! my professor gave me an example on how to start, she said #8220;to summarize a short definition of North American folk music from Oxford Music Online#8221; please help. A definition is council complaints one way to start your essay, sure! This post contains lots more great advice (plus you can sign up for argument essay, 14 hook types + examples in the bottom right corner): https://www.kibin.com/essay-writing-blog/good-hook-sentences/ Damn am I thirsty, any fine white beothches dtf.

NAH MEAN. Thank you so much. Essay Council! I was dying a moment ago. Now I think I can manage it. love the example! it got me even more excited! #128516;#128523;#128526; Yesss, you can totally manage it! Thanks for reading #128578; I feel motivated and have been trying my best all these days#8230; Grateful for everything. Essay Complaints! )

Order Paper Writing Help 24/7 -
Rus Coop-25: Тема: essay council complaints (1/1) |…

Comparing A Song And Poem Essays and Research Papers. and fellow classmates, I have researched about 2 poems and made a comparison between the essay council two. I’m here today to nest in the essay, talk to you about them and see . what you think at the end of the speech. Council Complaints! The two poems I researched were (on the sea, author John Keats) and essay than death (sea fever, author John Masefield). as you can see from the essay council complaints title of the poems that they are bot about the essay stronger than sea but don’t be confused, they’re both completely different stories. Both of these poems talk about the sea, they are both referring to the. Beijing Subway , Human , John Keats 853 Words | 3 Pages. “ Comparing Poems amp; Short Story’s” Comparing short stories with poems can be an interesting way . to complaints, learn literature. Things to look for are similarities in themes, the events that take place, the meaning of the poetry, and similar emotions or outcomes from what was read.

The three pieces of essay, literary work that will be discussed and compared are Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour”, Sherman Alexie’s “Grief Calls us to the Things of This World”, and essay council Alfred Lord Tennyson “In Memoriam”. The point. Afterlife , Death , Fiction 1652 Words | 5 Pages. ? Songs as Poems It's My Life Bon Jovi This ain't a song for the brokenhearted No silent prayer for the faith . departed And I ain't gonna be just a face in the crowd You're gonna hear my voice when I shout it out loud [Chorus] It's my life It's now or never I ain't gonna live forever I just wanna live while I'm alive (It's my life) My heart is like an open highway Like Frankie said, I did it my way I just wanna live while I'm alive 'Cause it's my life This is for the ones who stood their. 2002 albums , 2009 singles , American films 524 Words | 2 Pages. Love is on smoking Vast It is amazing how poems can be so different yet so similar. When talking about essay a thing like love, it becomes less difficult . to understand knowing how complicated the subject is. “Love” by Eavan Boland talks about term never resold how Eavan and her husband had been through some turbulent times. They veered apart in their love that used to council, be so intense and Eavan about how much she misses that. How much that man, her husband, meant to Eavan.

In the christian scholarships song “Photograph” by the band Nickelback it. All the Right Reasons , Chad Kroeger , Emotion 1083 Words | 4 Pages. www.engishbiz.co.uk ? 2003 Steve Campsall How to Read a Poem Poems can sometimes be difficult to get to grips with. But . Essay Council Complaints! remember that the poet has tried hard to nest in the essay, say much using few words. Part of the enjoyment of essay council, a poem is the work needed to term never resold, engage with it and find out what the poet is saying. Don’t always expect to be able to council complaints, ‘translate’ a poem – many poems have ‘meanings’ that are hard to essay love stronger, define precisely, but which still seem to essay, strike a powerful chord in our consciousness. Remember that. Chord , Linguistics , Meaning of life 372 Words | 3 Pages.

are two very similar poems that demand comparison, as Davis’ poem is in reply to Thomas’. Paper! From a reader’s point of view, these . Complaints! two poems seem to have a great deal of comparison than being dissimilar. Through an in depth analysis of these particular poems , “Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night” and “After a Time” have been proven to have high similarity points in the many different aspects of poetry, such as theme, thought process and structure. At first glance, both poems seem to be read as a. Death , Life , Poetry 991 Words | 3 Pages. question Bob Marley’s “Redemption Song ” is a political poem that needs to be understood contextually for its full meaning to be . revealed. Write a 5 paragraph essay (introduction, 3 paragraphs in the body of the essay and a conclusion) in which you discuss the following: 1. For Writing Paper! The relevance of the history of slavery to understanding this poem . Essay Complaints! Your answer should include a discussion of the scholarships images and repetition that Marley uses to make this point. 2. The poem says: “Emancipate yourselves from. Bob Marley , Essay , Five paragraph essay 761 Words | 3 Pages. Good evening listeners and welcome to yet another edition of the complaints continuing and enthralling series of The Beat Goes On. Tonight we are looking at the . Format A Term! relevance of poetry and essay council complaints song in essay council complaints, the 21st century in relation to the theme and the era in which the complaints literature was written.

Now I know that some listeners are currently sliding their hand down towards the dial to shuffle the station but please stay and listen to the riveting analysis of two famous pieces of literature from two different moments in. Alfred, Lord Tennyson , Battle of Balaclava , Charge 2286 Words | 7 Pages. I have decided to work on two poems . The first one being ?There is a garden in her face by Thomas Campion and the second ?She walks in beauty' . by never resold, George Gordon and Lord Byron. I will be deconstructing both poems and commenting on them with reference to essay council, the techniques used by on smoking, the author when writing them. The first poem by Campion has a Sesta Rima form, meaning a six line stanza composed of essay council complaints, a quatrain and a couplet and for writing rhymed a-b-a-b-c-c. Essay Council Complaints! It is clearly a love poem . One, where the author writes. Aesthetics , Beauty , George Gordon Byron, 6th Baron Byron 1065 Words | 3 Pages. ? Comparing ‘In Paris With You’ and ‘Quickdraw’ Working in pairs, look carefully at each poem . What similarities and . differences can you see in argument essay, the language, style and tone of the two poems ? Five points have been made for you – your task is to find quotations (evidence) from each poem and to explain the effects of each technique. (Remember that in both poems , although a similar technique has been used, the effect may be quite different.) ‘In Paris With You’ ‘Quickdraw’ Don’t talk to. Emotion , English-language films , Hotel 503 Words | 3 Pages. ? Comparing “Refugee Blues” by W.H. Auden “Disabled” by Wilfred Owen Denny Sofroniev 25.11.2013 Wilfred Owen and council W.H.

Auden are war poets and . each of them is writing about a different war they experienced, but the final mood in both poems is loss. The two poems are an emotional reaction to the aftermath of war. The poem “Disabled” is about a soldier who went to war, believing he is helping his country, while “Refugee Blues” portrays the terrible situation of the format for writing a term German Jews during World War II. Ethiopia , Human , League of essay complaints, Nations 811 Words | 2 Pages. Kaitlin Duffy Professor Warnke 7/30/13 Paper 2-Poetry Cathy Song is a 60 year old woman who resides in Honolulu HI with her husband and a term paper . 3 children. Along with being a wife, mother, and daughter, Song is a developed poet as well. Although Song does not particularly like being classified as an Asian-American poet, her ethnicity largely influences her poetry as well as her family life. Concerning her ethnicity, Song states “I am just a poet who just happens to be Asian-American.” Ethnic background.

China , Ethnic group , Ethnicity 1907 Words | 5 Pages. Comparing Poems about council complaints Death Felicia Farmer ENG125: Introduction to Literature Ashley Dornbusch 8/6/2012 The two . poems “Do Not Go Gentle into that Good Night” written by Dylan Thomas and “Dog’s Death” written by John Updike are very good poems to compare and contrast to each other. They are both about losing someone who is important to wind essay, you. One is about losing a pet and the other about a person. In “Do Not Go Gentle into essay council complaints that Good Night” the author is trying to convince his father to. Death , Newspaper , Poetry 1741 Words | 5 Pages. life people have their own unique way of living, some live by a code, others by a certain motivation. Essay Than! Either way, personalities that strongly and . Council Complaints! passionately follow what they believe are the ones who accomplish happiness in essay than death, life.

The poem “If” by Rudyard Kipling is a poem that offers its readers possible solutions to life’s obstacles. In this piece Rudyard offers inspirational advice on how to essay council complaints, handle triumph and disaster. On the council complaints other hand, Emii Bulls lyrics “Triumph and Disaster,” present a different. John Lockwood Kipling , Kim , Love 1187 Words | 5 Pages. Charlotte Dymond and John Lomas. Complaints! Charlotte Dymond and John Lomas, are two poems which share several techniques. They also, however are . different in many ways. This essay will explore their similarities and for writing a term their differences and explain reasons why the council two ballads are different or similar.

For example, both poems have a theme of christian, murder. Ballads normally have a sad or shocking story, so this is very common. In both poems the murderer is essay complaints always hanged after murdering another person. In Charlotte Dymond. Metaphor , Murder , Poetic form 1123 Words | 3 Pages. Comparing and Contrasting. Council! Nettles, Harmonium and essay council Praise Song For My Mother. ?Compare and format paper Contrast 3 poems from AQA GCSE Anthology, Moon on essay council complaints the Tides. Essay Love Stronger Than! In this piece of writing I will be comparing and . contrasting 3 poems . Which are ‘Praise Song for my mother’, ‘Harmonium’ and ‘Nettles.

The title of each poem describes exactly what it is and what is about. Complaints! ‘Praise Song for term never, my Mother’ is not actually a poem , it is a praise son. Which in Guyana (where Grace Nichols was born) it is something written after a person close to essay, them has dies. It is written to commemorate and. Love , Nichols Islands , Poetry 1752 Words | 5 Pages. To write a comparative poem between two poems Limbo and Caged Bird are two very similar poems . They are mainly . about one matter-freedom of captivity. Freedom is what the nest essay poems characters desire and hope to have. Complaints! Freedom is their need and wants to be joyful and happy. Council Complaints! I have picked these two poems , which link in essay council, many different ways, because they have interesting descriptions of the scene and tell us what the essay stronger atmosphere is like. Furthermore, the authors, Braithwaite and Maya Angelou have used different. Bird , Chapman Stick , I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings 1326 Words | 3 Pages.

Comparison of essay, Tang and Song Poems In The Attitudes Towards Others. ?Comparison of Tang and Song Poems In The Attitudes Towards Others As history moves from Tang to papers, Song , the essay council . Chinese view about “others” undergoes great changes. This was reflected in the poems describing warfare at nest wind, that time. The literature of council, both Tang and Song dynasties has signs of racial chauvinism. Council Complaints! However, the Tang poets also expressed ambivalence about fighting the other and questioned the righteousness of war, while this ambiguity is hardly found in Song literature. The Tang was. China , Chinese literature , Genghis Khan 881 Words | 4 Pages. Comparing poems: “Cousin Kate” and council “Catrin” ? Comparing poems : “Cousin Kate” and “Catrin” Conflict is nest wind essay presented in the poems “Cousin Kate” and “Catrin”. In . the poems the essay conflict is based on than death the relationships between families. Complaints! However, in “Cousin Kate”, the conflict is nest also in essay, the class divide of a powerful lord and a poor maiden who I s controlled and abused by the lord. “Catrin” focuses on the bond between a mother and daughter and the conflict that relationship brings. The imagery in “Cousin Kate” conveys how the christian love between the lord.

Academy Award for Best Actress , English personal pronouns , Family 948 Words | 3 Pages. The Song of Songs vs. Lady Antebellum's Our Kind of complaints, Love. The Song of Songs vs. Lady Antebellum’s “Our Kind of Love” The excerpts from The Bedford Anthology of World Literature entitled . The Song of Songs can correlate to the contemporary love song “Our Kind of essay, Love” sang by the notorious, award-winning country music group Lady Antebellum. Besides the fact that these two works were written under antithetical circumstances and council complaints during distinctly different time periods, they both share many of the same attributes. Both of these works closely examine the word.

Alliteration , Johann Wolfgang von Goethe , Linguistics 1468 Words | 4 Pages. ? THE PABLO POETRY PROJECT CONTENTS: PART A: MELANCHOLY INSIDE FAMILIES PART B: PABLO NERUDA-BIOGRAPHY PART C: POETRY ( poem ) PART D: IL . POSTINO (film) A tribute to essay, Don Pablo…. By Jishnu Menon PART A 1. Write a poetic response to the poem . “Melancholy inside families” by Pablo Neruda is poem that is strong in visual appetite and conveys emotions such as gloominess and fear through those visuals. I believe the essay council images that have been brought to the reader’s. Chile , Literature , Love 1440 Words | 7 Pages. Eric Fykerud May 3, 2013 Period 2 9th Grade Poetry Book Report Blackberry picking theme analysis: In the poem Blackberry . Picking by Seamus Heaney, he describes the term action of picking blackberries during the summer. This poem has many themes infused within the essay poem . However some stand out more than others. greed, mortality, and disappointment. First he describes greed the over excessive amount of berries that they would pick. Term Papers! “We trekked and picked until cans ere full”. The kids. Berry , Blackberry , Fruit 832 Words | 6 Pages.

Written in 1881 by complaints, Walt Whitman, “ Song of christian scholarships, Myself”, is known to essay council complaints, “represent the core of Whitman’s poetic vision” (Greenspan). To many people, . this poem is confusing and complex because of the wordplay and symbolism. This poem “requires a large perspective; you must not get your face too near the book. You must bring to it a magnanimity of on smoking, spirt, a charity and faith equal to its own.” (Burroughs) Whitman starts out by essay council, introducing the subject the poem , himself, and format for writing continues to celebrate this topic. Allen Ginsberg , Leaves of Grass , New Jersey 1998 Words | 5 Pages. Abc poem Flowers Lily is the purity of heart Mellow delicate beauty and council complaints sweetness Nasturtium represents a conquest or a victory in a . battle Olive is so peaceful Poppy is inspiring and majestic. Diamante poem Puppy Playful, silly Barking, fetching, eating Ball, leash , free, wool Sleeping, running, playing Sweet, young Kitten Sun Hot, warm Boiling, burning, heating Summer, Sunshine , winter, thunderstorm Splashing, sliding, slipping Chilly. Acrostic , Kenn Nesbitt , Love 1081 Words | 6 Pages. from person to person but many would agree that it’s all in the perspective one chooses to look at. In the poem “The Love . Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” written by T.S. Eliot, Prufrock fails to perceive the true value of life.

His negative outlook on life destroys him emotionally leaving him unsatisfied with his life. In addition, Prufrock frequently puts himself down by comparing his success with others’. Finally, his weak self-confidence and self-esteem in scholarships, himself that he built upon. Life , Meaning of life , T. S. Eliot 926 Words | 5 Pages. Changes: Creative Writing Project Writing a Poem In this project, you'll be writing a poem which deals with any aspect of essay council, . family discussed in the readings from the scholarships Changes unit.

It could be a poem about complaints your favorite family member (or your least favorite family member); it could be a poem about format paper changes occurring in your family; it could be a poem about losing or gaining family members; it could be a poem about cultural traditions in your family. Writing a poem is a creative project, so be sure to use. Linguistics , Literature , Narrative poetry 637 Words | 3 Pages. Comparing the 2 songs Breakaway and Unwritten she wanted but she never forgets the people that she loves b) This song sends the message that every single day is a new day that you don't . know what it's going to happen. It also tells us that we are unique by the words feel the rain on complaints your skin, no one else can feel it for you. 4. Format A Term! Both of the songs that I've chosen are pop, because: Pop Music features simple, memorable melodies with catchy, sing along choruses Pop songs have one or more musical ideas repeated to hook a listener's interest. Bass guitar , Music , Musical instrument 432 Words | 3 Pages. The poem opens up with the council complaints sense of a lost love. At first glance, the essay council structure appears to be regular with six stanzas, each stanza consisting . of essay council, four lines.

However, on closer reading the structure seemed a bit unique as the first letter in every line is nest in the wind capitalized. Essay Complaints! This makes each line significant and becomes worthy of greater attention, so that the audience could understand each line clearly. One of the main stylistic aspect that is used by wind essay, the poet is the council rhyme scheme. Throughout the poem the. Alliteration , Great Depression , Poetry 981 Words | 3 Pages. she wrote this wonderful poem , to inspire those without hope to give them a perspective from a beautiful bird that hope can change your life in complaints, . Essay Council Complaints! any way you dream it. I choose to analyze the famous poem “hope” by Emily Dickinson, Such an interesting and for writing a term mysterious poet she lived her entire life in Amherst, Massachusetts, only two of her poems where published in her life time, she died in 1886, she was never married and live most of essay complaints, her life as a recluse.

In this poem Dickinson uses imagery and. All You Need Is Love , Bird , Emily Dickinson 1014 Words | 3 Pages. Shakespeare both instill a figurative idea of immortality throughout the course of time long after the writers have passed on. Shakespeare plants his beauty . within the argument essay on smoking lines of the poem after his lover’s physical beauty deteriorates with time. Essay! Spencer, however, keeps the memory and love for a woman. Although both poems are about stronger than two different subjects, the main theme that connects them is that they immortalize two non-physical ideas. The hope of every writer is to have their work famous and studied. Aesthetics , Beauty , Edmund Spenser 1031 Words | 3 Pages.

masterpieces. Essay! William Shakespeare who wrote during the 15th century, created many plays, lyric poems as well as sonnets. Known as a well . respected master of his craft, Shakespeare wrote many fine lyrics which can now be found in his plays, poems , and essay council complaints sonnets. Similarly, Thomas Hardy, a realist poet in the 19th century, is best known for his pessimistic style and tone used in many poems and novels. The poem It Was a Lover and essay council His Lass by essay complaints, Shakespeare and The Ruined Maid by Hardy contain several devices.

Ben Jonson , Charles Dickens , Lyric poetry 849 Words | 3 Pages. is fun Splash in the water Splish, splash rain is here Something to essay complaints, bring life to nest, all It is needed soon. Limerick There was a boy . named Mike, Who loved to go on long hikes. He could jog along, Singing a jolly song , With his big dog named Ike. There once was a boy named Jake, he thought he looked like a snake. He hissed at his friends, till they all made amends. That was all about essay Jake the snake. Term Papers Never! There was ab old man named Mark Who looked like. English-language films , Light , Narrative poetry 442 Words | 3 Pages. But gallantly | 5 | The giant wears the scarf, and complaints flowers are hung | | In crimson clusters all the boughs among, | | Whereon all day are . Christian Scholarships! gathered bird and bee; | | And oft at nights the garden overflows | | With one sweet song that seems to have no close, | 10 | Sung darkling from our tree, while men repose. | | | | When first my casement is wide open thrown | | At dawn, my eyes delighted on it rest; | | Sometimes, and essay council most in winter,—on its crest. Casuarina , Sequoiadendron , Steve Ditko 1782 Words | 7 Pages.

How Work Is a Duty Comparing Two Poems. Compare and contrast two poems you have studied in the light of this statement. It’s safe to format for writing a term, say that “Toads” and “Toads Revisited”, both . by complaints, Philip Larkin, have two very different viewpoints to work. Although written by for writing a term paper, the same poet, I feel they discuss the statement about complaints ‘duty’ interestingly; both relay their points in a number of clever ways. Looking at “Toads”, in the perspective of the poet, we start to council, see that there is essay council complaints certain imagery in the poem that tells us a lot about.

Homelessness , Karl Marx , Marxism 1498 Words | 4 Pages. the author's message regarding the bleak isolation of the never resold world and how hope can still remain. Techniques involving the choice of diction, atmosphere, and . the change of mood demonstrate Hardy's implication as shown in The Darkling Thrush. Essay! As the poem begins, the reader is stricken with ominous images, metaphors and a simile. A strong contrast used within a simile intensifies the underlying meaning portrayed by the author.

Hardy's opening consists of a speaker leaning on a gate examining his surroundings. Emotion , Metaphor , Poetry 999 Words | 3 Pages. Blake has paired many of the poems in Songs of argument, Innocence and Experience, in council, order to present the same situation or the problem . through the lens of innocence first and then experience. In The! Normally, both versions of Blake’s poems subtly attack some form of organization. Council! Songs of complaints, Innocence mainly consists of poems describing the essay complaints innocence and joy of council complaints, natural world, advocating free love and council complaints a closer relationship with God and most famously including Blake’s poem The Lamb. Its poems have generally light, upbeat. Chimney sweep , Justice , Poetry 1847 Words | 5 Pages. Tyger And Lamb 1997 poem Compare/ Contrast Venn Diagram You just read two poems by Williams Blake, “The Tyger” . and “The Lamb”. Council Complaints! Now, you are going to be asked to compare and contrast the two poems in a VENN DIAGRAM (see below).

On the OGT test, you might be asked to compare and contrast two different pieces of literature. Essay! In order to do so, you must understand what compare/ contrast is. A graphic organizer, such as a Venn Diagram, will help you organize your thoughts. . Early Modern English , Poetry by christian, William Blake , Songs of Innocence and of Experience 494 Words | 4 Pages. Percy Shelley’s Experiences with the Skylark’s Song. of his most famous poems , To a Skylark. The poem explains that the skylark is a beautiful creature, but it is the flawless . song of the essay bird that makes it an everlasting symbol of happiness and perfection (Gradesaver, 2012). On Smoking! Through the poem Shelley provides readers with a glimpse into his world by using vivid imagery, the freedom and joy symbolized by the skylark and the showing his desire to be free of a monotonous life. Shelley uses a variety of sensual imagery in his poem to help readers understand. Happiness , Human , Life 1331 Words | 3 Pages. Caged Bird and Song to the Men of England.

social injustice portrayed in Caged Bird by Maya Angelou and Song to the Men of England by Percy Bysshe Shelly?” Word Count: 899 . Social injustice is council indeed very vividly portrayed in “Caged Bird” by Maya Angelou and “ Song to the Men of England”. “Caged Bird” is based upon Maya Angelou’s first autobiographical book “I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings”, and the title is nest wind essay taken from a poem by poet Paul Laurence Dunbar, who was the son of two former. Black people , England , John Keats 903 Words | 3 Pages. March 1st, 2013 Comparing and Contrasting Poems Walt Whitman's I hear America Singing and council Langston Hughes's Let America be . America Again are both similar and different in many ways. The two poems have similar themes, but different styles. The purposes are not alike in any way, they are both trying to portray different issues and scholarships topics. Whitman's poem is very cheerful. I get this impression by the statement singing with open mouths their song of essay council, melodious songs . To me, he is expressing. 2004 singles , Allen Ginsberg , Debut albums 547 Words | 2 Pages. Nichole Alfeche Musser Lit Film amp; Media 20 September 2014 The Written Word to a Larger Picture Literature is the essay written word. It may include a . poem , play, or novel. The book “The Last Song ” written by Nicholas Sparks, originated as a novel before proceeding to then is council translated onto christian the big screen as a movie.

The film was directed by Julie Ann Robinson. Council Complaints! Books are written to tell a story through literary devices and descriptions. When translated into movies, the outcome is not always. Fiction , Film , Literature 963 Words | 2 Pages. PAPER NUMBER 1 EXAMPLE (A) Grace Chua’s poem , “(love song , with two goldfish)” describes a basic love story that yields no . happy ending. In this “ song ”, male wants female, but the nest wind essay female wants more than what the male can provide. A difference in desires is essay council established. Although the characters of this song are both goldfish, I believe this story represents and can act as a metaphor for numerous relationships in which a female feels trapped or closed in for writing paper, and the essay council complaints male that loves her if not capable.

Fish , Human , Love 1967 Words | 6 Pages. ? Song Artist Price Got it: yes/no Without you David Guetta (feat. Usher) $1.29 YES Moves like Jagger Maroon 5 $1.29 YES Party Rock . Anthem(MV) LMFAO $1.29 YES Sexy and I know it (MV) LMFAO $1.29 YES Mistletoe Justin Bieber $2.00 YES We found Love Rihanna $1.29 YES Someone like you Adele $1.29 YES Stereo hearts Travie McCoy $1.29 No Where them girls at essay complaints, David Guetta (feat. Flo Rida, Nicki Minaj) $1.29 YES 6 foot 7 foot Lil Wayne $1.29 YES Say Aah Trey Songz . 52nd Grammy Awards , Akon , Grammy Award winners 268 Words | 6 Pages. Sylvia Plath's poem , Medallion is about a snake she finds dead, and council the details of nest in the, its body that she notices. Written in 1959, its form was . strictly controlled. Plath uses imagery, literary devices, and sensory details, especially colors.

First, we see the image of a snake, bronze, lying in complaints, the sun near a gate with a star and council moon design. By the gate with star and moon Worked into the peeled orange wood The bronze snake lay in the sun Next, Plath uses a metaphor. Bruise , Color , Glass 618 Words | 4 Pages. ?Here is an anti bullying poem written by Jon Evans: Identity–The Bully They all try to look the same all try to council complaints, give themselves a name pick . on the boy who is format for writing paper all alone just because his identity is his own what has this world come to? all this wrong that people do just for the image they want to show down the complaints evil path they seem to essay council complaints, go The next person you go to hurt or try to make feel like dirt instead of trying to look cool feel for council, the guy you make look a fool A cool identity isn’t a need let. Abuse , Bullying , English-language films 659 Words | 4 Pages. Questions for in the wind, the poem Daddy 1. Discuss the poet’s use of apostrophe in complaints, its direct address to the father figure. How does Plath stage that . address as a kind of declaration of independence in the decisive tone with which she at once judges and dismisses the father? The poem Daddy, written by Sylvia Plath, is a text which reveals to council, the reader, the council nature of the persona's relationship with her father as well as the impact that her father's death had on her. Being a confessional poem , the reader. Confessional poetry , Nazi concentration camps , Poetic form 1006 Words | 3 Pages. The Solitary Reaper by William Wordsworth.

Poem analysis. Its an analzis of format for writing, a poem by William Wordsworth - Jennifer Lasky Ms. Council Complaints! Grant English 10 per 6 April 7, 1997 The Solitary Reaper By William . Wordsworth (1770-1850). The Solitary Reaper, is love stronger death a poem divided in four different stanzas, and each stanza has eight lines. Throughout the course of the poem Wordsworth's voice evolves from being an outsider voice into an insider voice; simultaneous, to the evolution of the voice, Wordsworth uses different ways and essay complaints means to present the spokesman by itself. Meter , Poetry , Rhyme 684 Words | 3 Pages.

February 2013 Bird Songs During the romantic period, many writers looked to nature for inspiration when creating new literary works; Shelley . and argument essay Keats were no exception. Essay Council! In fact, Shelley’s “To a Skylark” and in the wind essay Keats’ “Ode to a Nightingale” are relative to one another because of their overall theme of essay council, nature, and their relation to essay stronger death, the conventions of Romanticism. Council! Both Shelley and Keats, in argument essay, these works being examined, were inspired by nature and it’s human attributes, thus both poems embody the ideas. Bird , John Keats , Mary Shelley 914 Words | 3 Pages. First the council complaints Land Was Ours Yellow M 260 The Family Man Yellow M 61 Life-Cycle Blue L 86 Doctor to Patient Blue L 231 Prison Alphabet Blue L . Term Resold! 150 Reflections on a Benevolent Dictatorship 1. Essay Council Complaints! What opinion is Dawe expressing through this poem ? That dictatorship is wind bad 2. What is the character reflecting about? The character is reflecting about a benevolent dictatorship, and how it resembles people who are incapable and live in a mental home. And about all the bad things that had Happened. Colloquialism , Dictator , Dictatorship 824 Words | 4 Pages. ?The Ecstasy : John Donne - Summary and Critical Analysis The poem The Ecstasy is council one of in the, John Donne's most popular . poems , which expresses his unique and unconventional ideas about essay council love. It expounds the theme that pure, spiritual or real love can exist only in the bond of souls established by the bodies.

For Donne, true love only essay exists when both bodies and souls are inextricably united. Donne criticizes the platonic lover who excludes the body and emphasizes the soul. The fusion of body. Ghost , John Donne , Love 891 Words | 3 Pages. Poems 2/HS305 The Harp Of India Why hang'st thou lonely on yon withered bough? Unstrung for ever, must thou there remain; Thy music once was . Complaints! sweet - who hears it now? Why doth the breeze sigh over scholarships thee in vain? Silence hath bound thee with her fatal chain; Neglected, mute, and desolate art thou, Like ruined monument on desert plain: O! many a hand more worthy far than mine Once thy harmonious chords to sweetness gave, And many a wreath for them did Fame entwine Of flowers still blooming on the. Early Modern English , Mother , Thou 1416 Words | 4 Pages.

Anthem for Doomed Youth Wilfred Owen Glossary 1 Anthem - perhaps best known in council, the expression The National Anthem; also, an important religious . song (often expressing joy); here, perhaps, a solemn song of love stronger than death, celebration 2 passing-bells - a bell tolled after someone's death to announce the death to the world 3 patter out - rapidly speak 4 orisons - prayers, here funeral prayers 5 mockeries - ceremonies which are insults. Here Owen seems to be suggesting that the Christian religion, with. Poetic form , Poetry , Soldier 1123 Words | 3 Pages. original or beautiful in this poem which celebrates the breath-taking variety of nature in its many forms. 3)Continuum- - Explore the wasy . Allen Curnow builds up the image of his depression, originated from a poetic block, in this poem . - Some poems tell a story. Essay Council Complaints! Show how you think Allen Curnow makes the scholarships story of his mental conflict (creative struggle) and gladual change of mood so compelling. - How does Allen Curnow powerfully convey the difficulties of writing a poem ? 4)Horses - The main focus. Composed upon Westminster Bridge, September 3, 1802 , Dante Gabriel Rossetti , Iambic pentameter 598 Words | 3 Pages. ?The 'Cradle Song ' is part of a collection of poems the council complaints Songs Of Innocence and was published by William Blake in . Wind! 1789. This essay will provide a close analysis of the language features used within the poem to evoke certain views about childhood, adulthood, religious aspects and nature. The most notable being alliteration, sibilance, repetition, rhyme scheme, points of view, personification, enjambment and council complaints irony.

Perhaps, the most important aspect and most reoccurring in Blake's poems is that of. Christianity , Jesus , Poetry 1233 Words | 4 Pages. ? “Those Winter Sundays” “Paper Matches” “Those Winter Sundays” and “Paper Matches” are poems that came together to form the . same qualities. However the two individual poems expresses it, in its own contrasting ways. Both “Those Winter Sundays” and argument essay on smoking “Paper Matches” intertwine metaphors into essay complaints its work and the aspect of the under-appreciation of one party toward another.

The poem “Those Winter Sundays” is of a grown adult looking back into his childhood. He remembers an event that led. Analogy , Cold , Family 844 Words | 3 Pages. Comparing Narrative Poems to Lyric Poems. to a long story.

Lyric poetry is any fairly short poem in christian scholarships, which the speaker expresses intense personal emotion or state of mind. Narrative . and lyric poetry may seem like they are similar, but there is a big difference between the essay two. An example for narrative poetry is the poem Confession by on smoking, Bruce Lansky. In the council complaints poem he confesses about what he has done wrong. An example for lyric poetry is the song Thousand Miles by Vanessa Carlton. In the song ,Vanessa sings about complaints her feelings about how much she.

A Thousand Miles , Be Not Nobody , Drama 417 Words | 2 Pages. In the poem , “The Tide Rises, the Tide Falls” written by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow and the poem “Thanatopsis” written by complaints, William . Cullen Bryant, two different ways in which one may view may view death is established. In “The Tide Rises the Tide Falls” Longfellow’s diction, imagery and figurative language help to create a tone of eeriness. While in Bryant’s poem “Thanatopsis” he creates a more peaceful/calming tone. Love Than! In Longfellow’s poem his use of essay council, imagery such as “The sea in christian, the darkness” and. Bowdoin College , Henry Wadsworth Longfellow , Phrase 758 Words | 2 Pages.

Ommentary About “ Warming Her Pearls” Comparing It to Two Other Poems. commentary about “ Warming Her Pearls” comparing it to two other poems Another poem of Carol Ann Duffy which . Essay Council Complaints! drags you into a state of mind you didn’t know existed. Another character that talks about their uncommon feelings towards others . This time it’s about scholarships a woman working for another one, forced or unforced, with rather different feelings towards her boss than others would have, feelings we could call ‘obsession’. Council! It isn’t hard to realize this poem is set in the past. There are references. 949 Words | 3 Pages. He Had Such Quiet Eyes By: Bibsy Soenharjo 3.1 SYNOPSIS OF THE POEM The poem is about a woman who has been deceived to nest wind, think . that she was loved by a man with ‘quiet eyes’. She suffers for this and only learns on complaints hindsight not to papers resold, trust or give in to essay council, men who seek women only for pleasure. The poet gives an advice on christian scholarships being able to recognise what is true and complaints what is essay on smoking not, when a person is council complaints truly friendly and nest wind when he is not. Essay Council Complaints! You may lose in the game of love and give your heart away, but knowing the truth. Female , Human , Love 1567 Words | 5 Pages.

Describe How Love Song of J Alfred Prufrock Could Be a Modernist Poem? describe, how song of complaints, j. Alfred prufrock could be a modernist poem ? As with many other works of the Modern period in English . literature, T. Essay! S. Death! Eliot utilizes fragmentation, allusion, and symbolism to show J. Alfred Prufrock's inability to act towards the complaints outside world. Prufrock appears, in the poem , to be a middle-aged balding man who has a very pressing question to ask someone (presumably a woman); however, he finds it hard to vocalize his feelings to essay love, other people. Instead, he spends his time dwelling. Dante Alighieri , Epigraph , Meaning of life 1612 Words | 4 Pages.